- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:11:49 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2020/02/17-wot-discovery-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Zoltan! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT Discovery 17 Feb 2020 [2]Agenda [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#17_Feb_2020 Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Christian_Glomb, Christopher_Ambler, Michael_Koster, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Zoltan_Kis, Kunihiko_Toumura Regrets Chair McCool Scribe zkis, kaz Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Inviting Christopher 2. [5]Wiki and GitHub repo 3. [6]Last meeting minutes 4. [7]WoT security issue 160 5. [8]DID review 6. [9]Use cases 7. [10]Plans for next meeting * [11]Summary of Action Items * [12]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ Inviting Christopher <kaz> Kaz: we invite Christopher today again. right? <kaz> McCool: yes <kaz> scribenick: zkis Wiki and GitHub repo McCool: still setting up the github repo ... in the Discovery TF wiki there were prior discussion on discovery, we need to incorporate it somehow <kaz> [13]Discovery TF wiki [13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Discovery_TF McCool: created an issue under WoT Security Last meeting minutes <kaz> [14]Feb-10 minutes [14] https://www.w3.org/2020/02/10-wot-discovery-minutes.html <kaz> McCool: had further discussion about the publication schedule during the main call <kaz> ... we'll update the WoT wiki for the publication schedule for all the deliverables McCool: there was an action to create a revised discovery work schedule in the main WoT wiki page <kaz> ACTION: kaz to add a note on the publication schedule to the Feb-10 minutes McCool: past minutes approved WoT security issue 160 [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/160 [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/160 <kaz> McCool: Scripting doesn't have a directory <kaz> Zoltan: actually scripting does support directories McCool: the proposal was to have discovery only via directories ... and Scripting using out of band authentication ... maybe consider another API for discovery Zoltan: there are 2 issue here, architectural and scripting. I think the latter is not well argumented yet. McCool: OK, it needs more discussion DID review McCool: there was discussion in the Security call on decentralized identifiers ... there is related WG work ... and also some work on discovery as well ... will have a presentation about DID; check the security minutes from today <kaz> [16]FYI, Feb-17 WoT Security minutes [16] https://www.w3.org/2020/02/17-wot-sec-minutes.html#item02 McCool presenting DID shortly McCool: including metadata about service endpoints, that looks much like a TD ... so should we resolve DIDs with TDs ... one of the ways making them unique is via blockchain, in which we might have TDs <kaz> [17]Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0 [17] https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-did-core-20191209/ McCool: the DID group has not specifically been looking into IoT devices, so proposed a joint call ... will discuss timing in the WoT WG call ... one question is whether we need to check security schemes vs DID ... maybe a separate thing from Discovery ... but other opinions are welcome ... next, brainstorming about use cases Use cases McCool: collect short use cases ... in a new uses-cases readme md file [18]Use Cases [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/master/USE-CASES/README.md McCool starts recording use cases Zoltan: Provisioning/onboarding discovery McCool: that has multiple use cases ... one is discovering unowned devices in OCF Christian: have a device and find out what can I do with it, or what I cannot do because lack of authentication McCool: that is, peer to peer use case McCool deduced another use case, Plant Automation Christian: also, discover what services are using the devices (reverse lookup) ... but mostly what I can do with the whole installation, on a higher level McCool: adding Smart City services ... also, Visitor, Citizen and Remote access use cases <inserted> scribenick: kaz McCool: any other use cases on smart city? (none) McCool: (creates another entry for "cloud services") ... I may want to know what devices are accessible from a certain cloud service. ... any additional thoughts for use cases? Zoltan: we can keep it open and add more later McCool: sure <inserted> scribenick: zkis McCool: we could also ask Michael Lagally to add some ... like Database of Devices ... discovery of historical data from a device Christopher: a couple of smart home use cases ... onboarding, ownership, then configuring ACLs for different roles (visitors, etc) ... there are use cases when operator has access but beneficiary doesn't ... also, device to device and proxy roles and discovery ACL configuration McCool: also, adding hubs, bridges ... including specific bridges like Zigbee, OCF etc ... please continue adding use cases, and later we will categorize ... also, curate them later, using templates etc ... in order to be able to merge into Architecture ... also include those use cases which are debatable that belong to Discovery ... or make PRs and create issues Plans for next meeting McCool: first figuring out use cases, scope, etc ... then, make proposals ... that may also be conflicting Christian: which proposals are already on table? McCool: in the main WoT repository, proposals folder <McCool> [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/proposals/wot-discov ery.md [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/proposals/wot-discovery.md McCool: there are a lot of things to discuss, but it's a good start ... counterproposals are welcome, but should be aware of existing background ... AOB? <inserted> (none) McCool: For next weeks agenda, please submit proposals by email adjourned Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: kaz to add a note on the publication schedule to the Feb-10 minutes Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [20]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([21]CVS log) $Date: 2020/02/25 00:10:25 $ [20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2020 00:11:57 UTC