- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:11:49 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/02/17-wot-discovery-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Zoltan!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WoT Discovery
17 Feb 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#17_Feb_2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Christian_Glomb,
Christopher_Ambler, Michael_Koster, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
Zoltan_Kis, Kunihiko_Toumura
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
zkis, kaz
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Inviting Christopher
2. [5]Wiki and GitHub repo
3. [6]Last meeting minutes
4. [7]WoT security issue 160
5. [8]DID review
6. [9]Use cases
7. [10]Plans for next meeting
* [11]Summary of Action Items
* [12]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
Inviting Christopher
<kaz> Kaz: we invite Christopher today again. right?
<kaz> McCool: yes
<kaz> scribenick: zkis
Wiki and GitHub repo
McCool: still setting up the github repo
... in the Discovery TF wiki there were prior discussion on
discovery, we need to incorporate it somehow
<kaz> [13]Discovery TF wiki
[13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Discovery_TF
McCool: created an issue under WoT Security
Last meeting minutes
<kaz> [14]Feb-10 minutes
[14] https://www.w3.org/2020/02/10-wot-discovery-minutes.html
<kaz> McCool: had further discussion about the publication
schedule during the main call
<kaz> ... we'll update the WoT wiki for the publication
schedule for all the deliverables
McCool: there was an action to create a revised discovery work
schedule in the main WoT wiki page
<kaz> ACTION: kaz to add a note on the publication schedule to
the Feb-10 minutes
McCool: past minutes approved
WoT security issue 160
[15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/160
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/160
<kaz> McCool: Scripting doesn't have a directory
<kaz> Zoltan: actually scripting does support directories
McCool: the proposal was to have discovery only via directories
... and Scripting using out of band authentication
... maybe consider another API for discovery
Zoltan: there are 2 issue here, architectural and scripting. I
think the latter is not well argumented yet.
McCool: OK, it needs more discussion
DID review
McCool: there was discussion in the Security call on
decentralized identifiers
... there is related WG work
... and also some work on discovery as well
... will have a presentation about DID; check the security
minutes from today
<kaz> [16]FYI, Feb-17 WoT Security minutes
[16] https://www.w3.org/2020/02/17-wot-sec-minutes.html#item02
McCool presenting DID shortly
McCool: including metadata about service endpoints, that looks
much like a TD
... so should we resolve DIDs with TDs
... one of the ways making them unique is via blockchain, in
which we might have TDs
<kaz> [17]Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0
[17] https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/WD-did-core-20191209/
McCool: the DID group has not specifically been looking into
IoT devices, so proposed a joint call
... will discuss timing in the WoT WG call
... one question is whether we need to check security schemes
vs DID
... maybe a separate thing from Discovery
... but other opinions are welcome
... next, brainstorming about use cases
Use cases
McCool: collect short use cases
... in a new uses-cases readme md file
[18]Use Cases
[18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/master/USE-CASES/README.md
McCool starts recording use cases
Zoltan: Provisioning/onboarding discovery
McCool: that has multiple use cases
... one is discovering unowned devices in OCF
Christian: have a device and find out what can I do with it, or
what I cannot do because lack of authentication
McCool: that is, peer to peer use case
McCool deduced another use case, Plant Automation
Christian: also, discover what services are using the devices
(reverse lookup)
... but mostly what I can do with the whole installation, on a
higher level
McCool: adding Smart City services
... also, Visitor, Citizen and Remote access use cases
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
McCool: any other use cases on smart city?
(none)
McCool: (creates another entry for "cloud services")
... I may want to know what devices are accessible from a
certain cloud service.
... any additional thoughts for use cases?
Zoltan: we can keep it open and add more later
McCool: sure
<inserted> scribenick: zkis
McCool: we could also ask Michael Lagally to add some
... like Database of Devices
... discovery of historical data from a device
Christopher: a couple of smart home use cases
... onboarding, ownership, then configuring ACLs for different
roles (visitors, etc)
... there are use cases when operator has access but
beneficiary doesn't
... also, device to device and proxy roles and discovery ACL
configuration
McCool: also, adding hubs, bridges
... including specific bridges like Zigbee, OCF etc
... please continue adding use cases, and later we will
categorize
... also, curate them later, using templates etc
... in order to be able to merge into Architecture
... also include those use cases which are debatable that
belong to Discovery
... or make PRs and create issues
Plans for next meeting
McCool: first figuring out use cases, scope, etc
... then, make proposals
... that may also be conflicting
Christian: which proposals are already on table?
McCool: in the main WoT repository, proposals folder
<McCool>
[19]https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/proposals/wot-discov
ery.md
[19] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/proposals/wot-discovery.md
McCool: there are a lot of things to discuss, but it's a good
start
... counterproposals are welcome, but should be aware of
existing background
... AOB?
<inserted> (none)
McCool: For next weeks agenda, please submit proposals by email
adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: kaz to add a note on the publication schedule to
the Feb-10 minutes
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [20]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([21]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/02/25 00:10:25 $
[20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2020 00:11:57 UTC