- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:17:48 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2020/10/02-wot-pf-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ WoT online PlugFest - Day 5 02 Oct 2020 Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Daniel_Peintner, Hiroki_Endo, Hiroshi_Fujisawa, Kunihiko_Toumura, Philipp_Blum, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Ege_Korkan, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Ryuichi_Matsukura Regrets Chair McCool Scribe cris, kaz Contents * [2]Topics 1. [3]Guest 2. [4]Previous minutes 3. [5]Updates 4. [6]vF2F planning 5. [7]NHK video 6. [8]PR 89 by Hitachi 7. [9]PR 90 8. [10]PlugFest outcomes * [11]Summary of Action Items * [12]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ Guest <inserted> scribenick: cris McCool: any guest other than Philipp Blum from RIOT OS? Kaz: there's Hiroshi Fujisawa from NHK McCool: ok noted Previous minutes McCool: I noticed that Hiroshi was here also yesterday. I need to note that in the agenda ... Rob Smith from Away Team Software might follow up about geolocation ... any objection to publish the minutes? ... ok accepted Updates McCool: we are going to document a set a link relation types ... we have a document in wot-architecture repo ... I'll add the link in agenda ... please if you have a proposal for link relation types use that md file ... in the end I image to have a dedicated section in Thing Description spec Sebastian: what do you expect? we already have a section for links McCool: yeah but we don't provide any example for relation types Sebastian: ok vF2F planning McCool: I have a quick update about F2F <kaz> [13]vF2F wiki [13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020#Timetable_for_WoT_PlugFest_and_vF2F_during_TPAC McCool: we defined an agenda for f2f ... however we didn't schedule a slot for plugfest report ... we could squish down security Sebastian: I think it is better to have PF report at the very beginning of the F2F ... if we can't. we could do it in the first testing call McCool: the problem is that the first call is far. Therefore, we have to do some work and write down in the issue tracker what we have done. Sebastian: I agree McCool: yeah the problem is that everything in the F2F is pretty packed. ... I'd record everything today, I think it is the best option. Kaz: it is ok to record the problems using GitHub Issues. But we should still make brief report out during the vF2F as well. McCool: Right. What I am planning to do it is just mention that we noted the outcomes in the issue on the testing report ... I'll schedule a time slot ... Ege could you do this report? Ege: I am not sure McCool: I'll do it don't worry ... any other updates? NHK video McCool: could you please finish your demo? yesterday we had some connection issues Endo: we created a PR yesterday. <kaz> [14]PR 88 [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/88 McCool: ok you updated the readme and uploaded pictures/videos <kaz> [15]updated README.md by NHK [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/events/2020.09.Online/TDs/NHK Endo: we added node-red screenshots. where you can see our contribution highlighted McCool: thanks it is interesting ... can we see the video? Endo: sure, it's a short video: 20 second McCool: really nice video ... and use case ... thanks also for the screenshots! Sebastian: thank you also from my side! It is nice to see different things from other contributors PR 89 by Hitachi McCool: let's go to the next PR ... PR #89 from Toumura-san ... it is a really nice contribution Sebastian: yes indeed McCool: once we have semantics you could organize nodes in node-red. ... about the limitation (authorization not supported). we are going to require authentication in TDD and in the future we should solve this issue ... probably we should add an issue in your repository. Toumura: we still don't have a public repository McCool: it's nice that you also provided slides and video <kaz> [16]resource on Hitachi's prototype implementation of nodegen autopopulation server including the Powerpoint video [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/tree/master/events/2020.09.Online/prototypes/Hitachi McCool: David might be interested in this work too ... the story here it is that with node-red you can do IoT orchestration in less in 30 sec. it is awesome Sebastian: where are TDs stored? Toumura: the server has a DB populated with mDNS McCool: mDNS is one discovery method, in the future the work from the discovery task force might help Kaz: I suggest we raise GitHub issues to let us track the results. Also we might want to put together a PlugFest guideline based on all the accomplishments from the PlugFest this time. <McCool> [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/92 [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/92 PR 90 McCool: we have one more PR #90 <inserted> scribenick: kaz <inserted> [18]PR 90 [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/90 Cristiano: TD for a sprinkler McCool: every 20 seconds, you get data from the sensor Cristiano: yes McCool: would merge the PR and also raise an issue for the accomplishment ... (adds Farm/TUM mashup in addition to NHK and Node-red discovery integration) <inserted> scribenick: cris McCool: we could evolve this in an example PlugFest outcomes <kaz> [19]Issue 76 [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/76 McCool: I'm marking Map visualization as outcome. <kaz> [20]Issue 71 [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/71 McCool: about expirementation with TDD and node-wot. did we do that? Cristiano: no I didn't McCool: yeah we have to make sure that we have compatible implementations ... Ok I marked as a followup <inserted> [21]Issue 87 [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/87 McCool: issue 87 is also a follow up <inserted> [22]Issue 91 [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/91 McCool: issue 91 is more related to marketing ... about community building we are still working on it. ... Philip do you want to speak about it? Philipp: I just added my view as outsider of the group Sebastian: thank you for point this out. you are not the only one. ... we are doing our best to solve this issue ... we have also a new landing page ... there is a developer space <dape> see [23]https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/ [23] https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/ Sebastian: it is still under discussion <dape> some more planned updates, see [24]https://danielpeintner.github.io/wot-marketing/ [24] https://danielpeintner.github.io/wot-marketing/ Philipp: this is why I mentioned about doing outside the w3c. it is more reactive Ege: json schema have a tag on stackoverflow ... also other wg created outside communities McCool: we also have a lot of material but we need to organize it Kaz: let's move the discussion to the marketing call ... and find some possible solutions. McCool: (adds "PlugFest Outcome" label and "Plugfest Followup" label to the GitHub Issues from the online PlugFest) <kaz> [25]Issue 60 [25] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/60 Daniel: could you please link issue 76 in 60? McCool: sure ... btw, we are getting out of time.. <kaz> [26]updated comment for issue 60 [26] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/60#issuecomment-702752607 <kaz> [27]Issue 61 [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/61 <kaz> [28]comment added to Issue 61 [28] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/61#issuecomment-702753694 <kaz> [29]Issue 62 [29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/62 <kaz> [30]comment added to Issue 62 [30] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/62#issuecomment-702754206 <kaz> [31]Issue 47 on scenario for OneDM [31] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47 <kaz> [32]comment added to Issue 47 [32] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47#issuecomment-700684224 <kaz> ("Plugfest Outcome" label and "Plugfest Followup" label also added) <kaz> [33]Issue 58 on geolocation annotation [33] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/58 <kaz> ("Plugfest Outcome" label and "Plugfest Followup" label also added) McCool: take your time to review the issues that we marked today ... we are going to discuss them in the vF2F <kaz> [34]Issue 92 on consolidated accomplishments [34] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/92 McCool: cris can you make a screenshot of your mashup? Cristiano: sure I'll probably make a video McCool: it was a great PlugFest, thank you everybody Kaz: And thank you, Michael, for you efforts as well :) Sebastian: thank you everyone you did great! [adjourned] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [35]scribe.perl version ([36]CVS log) $Date: 2020/12/02 09:16:36 $ [35] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [36] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2020 09:17:53 UTC