- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:42:02 +0900
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9XEcQop+kc5hcx1QxzpVECvOUicYdi8tr5uFnbH9-WgDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave, Thanks for your comments. I think your points are inline with what I mentioned during the WoT Marketing call and we should continue to clarify our needs and requirements using the wot-marketing GitHub repository (and the WoT Marketing calls) ;) Regards, Kazuyuki On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 6:55 PM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Kaz, > > My regrets for missing the last marketing TF call. Some comments. > > 1. We have some flexibility with redesigning the /WoT/ landing page, and > should take advantage of that. It is current an HTML file in W3C’s CVS > space. The redesign of the W3C site overall is still at the stage of a call > for proposals, and is likely to take a while, so I wouldn’t let let get in > the way of changes we need to make now, even if we will have to make > further changes later when the site redesign comes through. > > 2. The WoT IG page is currently implemented with WordPress, and is > cumbersome to change. We’ve failed to make regular use of the blog post > facility that WordPress supports, so I don’t see much point in persevering > with WordPress for the IG page, as we can and should use the regular W3C > blog instead when we need to. > > 3. PLH’s autogenerated status pages should be seen as complementary to the > IG and WG pages. > > 4. We need to consider the target audiences we should be aiming at, e.g. > > - Decision makers & journalists interested in the IoT and > potential role of the WoT > - Engineers and software developers curious about the WoT > - People who are considering joining or have just joined the IG or > WG > - Regular active participants in the IG/WG > > We should exploit social media channels when we have something timely to > say, e.g. rechartering, major updates to specs, advancement to CR, > appearances at conferences, workshops, etc. > > We should have introductory materials and tutorials accessible via the > landing page. This should include a clear exposition of what problems the > WoT specs addresses and why this is important to businesses. > > Ideally the tutorials would include online running examples, but this > requires a WoT server. Can anyone commit to running a public WoT server > for the next couple of years? I could ask the W3C systems team if we could > run one here, but this would depend on what the IG/WG would want. > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 November 2019 13:42:43 UTC