- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:28:03 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-wot-sec-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Uday! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT IG - Security 04 Sep 2017 [2]Agenda [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Security_WebConf#Agenda See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-wot-sec-irc Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimrua, Michale_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Uday_Davuluru, Zoltan_Kis, Elena_Reshetova, Michale_Koster Regrets Chair McCool Scribe uday Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Issues and next steps 2. [6]NDSS workshop * [7]Summary of Action Items * [8]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <kaz> scribenick: uday Issues and next steps McCool: Discusses issues and next steps ... starting with the discussion on pull request 349 <kaz> [9]https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/349 pull request 349 has just been merged [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/349 Elena: TD privacy and TD local storage updated ... Security consideration section: goal is to use this to adopt security scenario and build one's own security objects McCool: might get a conflict issue <kaz> Kaz: a quick question <kaz> ... do you want to commit this by Wednesday (=finalizing the whole group review)? <kaz> Elena: this is not ready for commit and need more discussion Kaz: can we include this in architecture doc McCool: no time till the first public draft ... need security repo Elena: can have a single big document or sub documents McCool: lengthy document might overshadow topics ... threat model and security consideration can be put into one doc ... privacy is missing in the doc, need to add this Elena: started to add privacy related threats in threat model itself ... explains privacy with examples <kaz> McCool: would try a vote. anybody object to have a separate document for "WoT Security and Privacy Consideration"? McCool: do anyone objects separate deliverable for WoT security considerations Elena: need to highlight important parts McCool: agree ... need to separate implementation details ... we should create new doc under WoT repo and have a security repo in parallel Kaz: can create a separate repo if needed <kaz> ... "wot-security"? McCool: wot-security would be a good name Kaz: need to use repo manager to publish <kaz> Kaz: as part of the normative WG deliverables? if so we need to use the repository manager as well <kaz> McCool: should be an informative deliverable, e.g., a WG Note McCool: normative and informative parts of security smilar to WoT architecture repo how do we publish security? shall we make security as a separate doc instead of merging in architecture doc <kaz> because the description would become long McCool: how do people handle this in another groups Kaz: maybe with separate normative doc McCool: don't want to ember all security stuff in architecture doc Kaz: makes sense to start with informative note and decide with the chairs call McCool: will also create hyperlink between docs <McCool> McCool: we will aim for a separate security document, "WoT Security and Privacy Considerations" <McCool> we'll talk to the editors/chairs to confirm this <McCool> the document will be informative, but published in such a way (note) that we can hyperlink to sections from the other documents <McCool> ideally, we would have it in its own repo, parallel to the wot-architecture <McCool> proposed name: wot-security McCool: security in architecture doc clan up <kaz> [10]https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/#security-considerat ions [10] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/#security-considerations <zkis> [11]https://zolkis.github.io/wot-scripting-api/ [11] https://zolkis.github.io/wot-scripting-api/ ZK: already made a PR, can see on my gitthub page <kaz> [12]https://w3c.github.io/wot-scripting-api/#security [12] https://w3c.github.io/wot-scripting-api/#security <kaz> McCool: should read "The security section is under development and will be completed later." <kaz> ... on the other hand, there is a link to the threat model in the TD draft <kaz> [13]https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#threat-model [13] https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#threat-model <kaz> Kaz: do we want to update the Architecture/Scripting API as well with the detailed description? <kaz> ... or ok to publish them asis? <kaz> McCool: publishing them with the minimum description now is ok thanks for the filling kaz <kaz> ... but would like to remove "More general discussion of overall security of a Thing (for example, best practices for WoT Interface design) can be found in the WoT Architecture document. " from the "7. Security Consideration" section of the TD draft <kaz> [14]https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#security-consi deration [14] https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#security-consideration <kaz> McCool: and also for the architecture document <kaz> ... the Editor's note at "8. Security Considerations" <kaz> ... Security and privacy considerations are under development <kaz> ... and remove "For now, only the sub-section headings are included to indicate the roadmap for the WoT Architecture security considerations." <kaz> rsagent, make log public <kaz> [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues <kaz> github issues for architecture above <kaz> McCool: add "Please see work in progress at WoT Security and Privacy." <kaz> ... linking to: [16]https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/security-privacy [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/security-privacy <kaz> ... (creates a pull request on his own repo; and will create a pull request on the main repo) <kaz> ... next <kaz> ... Elena, if you can take out an overview on W3C WoT security and privacy <kaz> ... copy the framework from the WoT Architecture document McCool: next steps: ER to create new doc under WoT Security and privacy and start general documentation MM to make sure the draft is clean <kaz> Elena: regrets for the next call (Sp. 11) <kaz> McCool: if you can send a link to your repo, I can make a pull request NDSS workshop <kaz> McCool: worked on the proposal McCool: proposal submitted to NDSS <kaz> McCool: deadlines: <kaz> ... cfp 25 sep 2017 <kaz> ... now done and in the pipe <kaz> ... focused on standards <kaz> ... review of existing standards <kaz> ... including but not limited to W3C standards <kaz> ... will be held in February <kaz> Elena: paper deadline too close? <kaz> McCool: we should discuss that <kaz> ... notice to authors: 15 Jan 2018 <kaz> ... not expecting a big paper, just 1-3 pages <kaz> ... publication-ready papers: 1 Feb. 2018 <kaz> [ adjourned ] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.152 ([18]CVS log) $Date: 2017/09/04 15:26:27 $ [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 4 September 2017 15:29:15 UTC