W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > November 2017

[PlugFest] minutes - 1 November 2017

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 05:20:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9U3Qnw8d8Gjfhd=JOiKubaXG7E8OAKvC=9jbwa7ysKj6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2017/11/01-wot-pf-minutes.html

also as text below.

I found Michael Koster was also kindly taking notes on the
#wot IRC channel, so have merged it with my notes on the
#wot-pf IRC channel.

Thanks, Michael Koster!

Kazuyuki

---

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                              WoT PlugFest
                              01 Nov 2017

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_McCool,
          Tomoaki_Mizushima, Toru_Kawaguchi, Ryuichi_Matsukura,
          Soumya_Kanti_Datta, Michael_Koster, Takeshi_Sano,
          Kazuaki_Nimura, Takeshi_Yamada

   Regrets
   Chair
          Kaz

   Scribe
          kaz, mjkoster

Contents

     * [2]Topics
         1. [3]agenda
         2. [4]Servient configuration for PlugFest
         3. [5]schedule and organization
     * [6]Summary of Action Items
     * [7]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

agenda

   kaz: 2 topics
   ... preparation status and plugfest organization

   (no objections)

Servient configuration for PlugFest

   [8]Matsukura's updated slides

      [8] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wot-ig/2017Nov/0001.html

   kaz: not the md file but additional slides?

   matsu: slides and also GH update

   kaz: has just merged the pullrequest

   matsu: the 1st page is as same as the one last week
   ... 2nd page is updated one
   ... please check it
   ... 3rd page explains a possible scenario
   ... [Scenario 1]
   ... Remote application servients connect to each Remote proxy
   and device servient.
   ... Each participant setup and check the behavior before the
   connections.
   ... [Scenario 2]
   ... A remote proxy servient can accept request from an
   application and operate local devices via a local proxy
   servient. ... The remote proxy has a Thing directory that keeps
   the TDs corresponding to all devices. ... The application can
   get the TD from it.
   ... applications can get TDs from the remote proxy servient

   kaz: each app can talk with Fujitsu's remote proxy?

   matsu: yes
   ... [Scenario 3]
   ... Local application servients connect to each local proxy and
   device servient.
   ... similar to the scenario 1
   ... but local apps

   mccool: there will be proxy on the Internet with my system

   koster: a possible device servient on the cloud side with my
   system
   ... we're making direct connection with the Internet
   ... sort of like the Osaka case

   matsu: want to see your setting

   koster: remote proxy in front of devices
   ... device servient directly connected with app servients
   ... also going to have MQTT broker has well

   matsu: your remote proxy servient expose Thing capability?

   koster: yes
   ... how about you, McCool?

   mccool: kind of complicated
   ... SSH tunnel

   scribenick: mjkoster

   mccool: will tunnel device interactions from local to remote
   using private protocol

   scribenick: kaz

   mccool: the same HTTP available on the both sides through the
   tunnel

   kaz: so from which servient or module can you provide device
   capability to some of the servients in Matsukura's diagram?

   scribenick: mjkoster

   mccool: there will be a remote endpoint and local endpoint
   ... exposing the same interface

   scribenick: kaz

   kaz: in that case, maybe the remote server could expose the
   device capability. right?

   koster: we see a local endpoint and remote endpoint

   kaz: is it possible for the remote endpoint (or the local
   endpoint) to expose the device/application capability?

   scribenick: mjkoster

   mccool: there will be a remote endpoint and local endpoint
   ... exposing the same interface

   scribenick: kaz

   mccool: would talk about that during TPAC
   ... would see simplest proxy
   ... I'll have application servient
   ... haven't quite clarified how to handle TDs

   scribenick: mjkoster

   mccool: local servient and remote servient use different URLs
   ... thinking about including both local and remote links in the
   TD

   scribenick: kaz

   mccool: we can discuss it during TPAC

   matsu: for the PlugFest, we should clarify what kind of
   interface will be supported

   mccool: detect motion, etc.
   ... very simple, e.g., booleans
   ... brightness control, etc.

   matsu: would like to discuss the detail during the weekend
   ... any further questions about those 3 scenarios?

   kaz: will you update the md file based on those proposals?

   matsu: slide 2 already included
   ... 3-5 to be included

schedule and organization

   matsu: schedule for Sat/Sun
   ... Saturday, Nov. 4
   ... 9am: door opens and setup starts
   ... 10am-2pm: scenario 1/2
   ... noon-1pm lunch
   ... 2-5pm: scenario 2 and scenario 3
   ... Sunsay, Nov. 5
   ... 9am-noon: app development
   ... noon-1pm: lunch
   ... 1-5pm: demos/discussions for TPAC breakout
   ... [Points of this plugfest]
   ... Introduce proxy servient to set up a larger scale system
   ... Proxy servient aggregate applications and devices to easily
   manage the entire system
   ... developed 4-layered model
   ... WoT servients support protocol binding with various device
   interfaces
   ... new features
   ... Thing directory
   ... Event operation
   ... connectivity between local and remote
   ... via NAT traversal
   ... [Agenda for the breakout on 8th]
   ... main demonstration and other demonstrations
   ... main: show the interoperability of 8 implementations
   ... each: demos from each participant

   mccool: serial presentation or parallel?
   ... sequential presentations vs each presentation at booth
   using poster
   ... personally like the parallel approach better
   ... kind of poster session

   matsu: we need to show the total idea of PlugFest
   ... main demo on interoperability
   ... that's very important deliverable of our effort

   mccool: maybe half and half
   ... key presentation on WoT in general
   ... but we don't want to use the whole 2 hours for sequential
   presentations
   ... maybe half and half
   ... or some combination

   matsu: what do you mean by "half and half"?

   mccool: depends on the people there
   ... maybe the first people leave and new people will come
   ... the poster should be provided for parallel sessions

   matsu: how to organize the booths?
   ... first half for the main interoperability demo
   ... should be shown at the main booth

   mccool: right
   ... btw, we're not sure about the size of the room

   kaz: kind of consensus to have a bigger booth for the
   interoperability
   ... and what to be done by the smaller booths?

   mccool: semantic tagging, etc.?
   ... we can decide in the PlugFest

   kaz: you mean the discussion during the weekend?

   scribenick: mjkoster

   mccool: we can also illustrate the individual pieces
   ... we should figure this out on the second PF day

   matsu: argee

   mccool: saturday more exploratory, sunday to decide on the
   breakout and demo
   ... small teams working on focused demonstrations
   ... take some time on the first day to summarize

   scribenick: kaz

   mccool: we could have 2 kinds of demos
   ... big pictures
   ... at the end of Saturday, we should see what to do
   ... and draft the poster as well
   ... should have brief discussion on Saturday

   kaz: right

   mccool: 30min at the end of Saturday
   ... and detailed discussion on Sunday
   ... need to decide what to do on Sunday
   ... assuming we'll print the posters on Monday

   kaz: basically in line with Matsukura's proposal
   ... but not sure if we need to use the whole Sunday afternoon

   mccool: 30 mins at the end of Saturday

   kaz: how long should we use on Sunday?

   mccool: another hour on Sunday
   ... 1-2pm
   ... and then focused demo discussion by each team 2-5pm
   ... including presentation materials
   ... maybe 30mins for feedback at the end of Sunday
   ... that is my suggestion
   ... we could talk about the details about Sunday schedule at
   the end of Saturday as well

   kaz: so we should clarify at the end of Saturday how many
   project teams should be held
   ... and each project team should work on their project on
   Sunday

   matsu: how many of you want to show your own demo?

   mccool: I do have voice demo, OCF bridging, etc.
   ... doesn't have interoperability

   kaz: would be great if we could reuse your voice capability,
   etc., from the other's servient

   mccool: maybe not too difficult but...

   koster: discovery, etc.
   ... some of the features work with all the others

   mccool: can we put the schedule on the wiki?

   kaz: Matukura-san, you need to double check with Taki?

   matsu: yes
   ... will check with him
   ... the last point is...
   ... [Attention!]
   ... please share your TDs!
   ... provide your TDs under
   [9]https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest/2017-burling
   ame/TDs
   ... note that many guys simply use "my device", etc.
   ... so please follow some name convention like "company name" +
   "description"

      [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/plugfest/2017-burlingame/TDs

   kaz: meaning "company-device" like "panasonic-airconditioner"?
   ... or should use capital letter to show the word boundary?

   matsu: yes

   kaz: so should be something like "PanasonicCleaner" or
   "SmartThings-MotionSensor"
   ... will you update preparation.md?

   matsu: yes

   kaz: btw, Matsukura-san need to be get included in the Editors
   team for the repo

   mccool: yes
   ... and the information on schedule and name convention should
   go into the wiki as well

   kaz: yes
   ... at least the schedule part should go there
   ... tx, Matsukura-san
   ... please update the md and the wiki

   koster: one question
   ... would like to gather information on how people use proxy
   servients
   ... making some slides

   kaz: have you sent the slides out?

   koster: will do after this call
   ... e.g., someone said node-wot has some proxy capability
   ... will send them out

   kaz: tx!
   ... any other questions/comments?

   (none)

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [10]scribe.perl version
    1.152 ([11]CVS log)
    $Date: 2017/11/01 20:17:13 $

     [10] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [11] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:21:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:21:40 UTC