W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > June 2017

[wot-ig/wg] minutes - 7 June 2017

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:21:07 +0900
Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9WpGuQomrjneC9PaccZGFNS7SugL5FLmaqF1g0u_PPmsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2017/06/07-wot-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Victor!

Kazuyuki

---

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                               WoT IG/WG

07 Jun 2017

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Agenda

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/06/07-wot-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Elena_Reshetova, Feng_Zhng, Johannes_Hund,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Kster, Michael_McCool,
          Niklas_Widell, Taki_Kamiya, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
          Uday_Davuluru, Yingying_Chen, Yongjing_Zhang,
          Zoltan_Kis, DarkoAnicic, Daniel_Peintner,
          Victor_Charpenay, Katsuyoshi_Naka, Ryuichi_Matsukura,
          Masato_Ohura, Nan_Wang, Takeshi_Yamada, Kazuaki_Nimura

   Regrets
   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          victor

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]OCF liaison
         2. [6]oneM2M liaison
         3. [7]ETSI's IoT Week (23 – 26 October 2017 in ETSI HQ)
         4. [8]presentations
         5. [9]TF reports
         6. [10]F2F Logistics
         7. [11]AOB?
     * [12]Summary of Action Items
     * [13]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

OCF liaison

   McCool(MC): focus on 2 devices: light, motion sensor.
   Definition of prot. bindings

   MK: PR on the thing description, still to do

oneM2M liaison

   <kaz> [14]Yongjing's slides

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/PRESENTATIONS/WoT
Intro for oneM2M TP29 Industry Day (May 2017).pptx

   YZ: presentation two weeks ago

   in China, in front of local organization bodies. Same time as
   oneM2M's F2F.

   integration of WoT within oneM2M. Common scenarii, as shown in
   the last PlugFest

ETSI's IoT Week (23 – 26 October 2017 in ETSI HQ)

   <kaz> [15]Call for Presentations

     [15] http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-presentations

   <kaz> [16]Call for Demos

     [16] http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-showcases

   YZ: someone from WoT? I'll be there (on behalf of oneM2M, at
   least)

   MK: is in the calendar of IRTF T2T. Not sure anybody is going,
   though

   YZ: calls for presentations/demos. They might expect something
   from WoT

   Deadline for presentations: June, 20th

   JH: What topic do you expect to be discussed there?

   <kaz> [ there is some description on the workshop at:
   [17]http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-present
   ations]

     [17] http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-presentations

   YZ: main idea would be to encourage SDOs to collaborate.
   Collaboration WoT/oneM2M to put forward.

   MC: I'll see if I can make a pres. But somebody in Europe might
   be better?

   YZ: also call for demos. Focus on oneM2M. Can we showcase
   alignment with WoT?

   <kaz> [ call for showcases:
   [18]http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-showcas
   es]

     [18] http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-showcases

   MK: along those lines, specifying precisely what parts of
   oneM2M are of interest for WoT might be useful.

presentations

   none

TF reports

   MC: TF TD?

   TK: I moderated the last call (Sebastian is in vacation).

   discussion around serialization formats

   also TD namespace, asked W3C experts.

   MC: question in the OCF liaison: TD templates?

   TK: examples to collect from the past PlugFests, maybe?

   Kaz: During the last TD call, made a proposal about spliting
   protocol bindings into two layers: device-independent layer and
   device-dependent layer

   I'm encouraged to submit a pullrequest for it. Make sense to
   submit an issue first?
   kaz's strawman image on binding

   Kaz's strawman diagram on Binding

   MC: good idea

   MK: encapsulation as proposed here is good (separate prot.
   bindings, encapsulation of hypermedia controls)

   TK: other topic was how to use semantics (e.g. for discovery &
   orchestration)

   Michael Koster defined use cases, Darko proposed something
   based on that

   MK: need a follow-up (issue)

   DA: please let me know, so that I can comment

   TK: that was all.

   MC: LD TF?

   DA: nothing new, no telco last week.

   MC: Security TF?

   ER: threat model available

   examples still to provide

   PR for that.

   MC: procedure to merge PRs in the IG? (Not WG)

   Kaz: co-Chairs like you (McCool and Yongjing) can make the
   decision about the procedure. I think the TF leaders should
   have permission to approve pullrequests. Elena needs to be part
   of the editors

   MC: let's have discussion offline later.
   ... Scripting TF?

   JH: could not moderate last call. Zoltan?

   ZK: issue regarding synchronization

   common call with security next Monday

F2F Logistics

   <kaz> [19]f2f wiki

     [19] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_9-13_July_2017,_Düsseldorf,_Germany

   MC: registration page is up.

   <kaz> [20]Registration results so far

     [20] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WoTF2F201707/results

   please register.

   still no recommended hotel

   Uday: Still waiting for the list. Will update right after this
   meeting with other alternatives

   Quick update: separate payment for the restaurant (+ tour).
   Could participants pay cash at the venue?

   MC: amount?

   Uday: deadline for registration is June, 12th

   Needed for the Düsseldorf Congress Center

   MC: last time, last minute registration for the Open Day.
   Should be avoided for meeting days.

   Uday: external attendees: CEO of Lemonbeat will present.
   Matthias spoke about someone from SigFox?

   MC: agenda for the Open Day should be set soon

   topics?

   MK: is iot.schema.org in the scope?

   MC: sure

   JH: reached out to somebody from Microsoft (about Azure/WoT
   API). Still early

   MK: found a typo within the source of the registration page
   will let Kaz know about that

AOB?

   MC: iot.schema.org is something we could discuss? Or is it too
   early?

   MK: is a good idea. Intention is that anybody (not only
   semantic geeks) uses it. Raise awareness in our group might be
   a good idea.

   either next call or the one after.

   MC: end of the meeting

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [21]scribe.perl version
    1.152 ([22]CVS log)
    $Date: 2017/06/07 13:19:11 $

     [21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 13:22:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:27:47 UTC