- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:08:50 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9UOFAp8quSN84E+3gikOTw3_CBrNE2eKM00Obnf2sQo1A@mail.gmail.com>
available at: https://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Darko! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT IG/WG 22 Feb 2017 [2]Agenda [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#22_Feb_2017 See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/02/22-wot-irc Attendees Present Kaz, Carlos, Darko, Dave, Feng, Kajimoto, Naka, Nimura, Toumura, Ohura, Matej, Matthias, Johannes, Sebastian, MKoster, McCool, Philip, Yamada, Taki, Tokuyama, Victor, Yongjing, Nan_Wang, Fernando, Maria, Matsukura, Yingying Regrets Chair Matthias, McCool, Kajimoto, Yongjing Scribe DarkoAnicic Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Agenda 2. [6]Presentation from Konica Minolta 3. [7]The WoT Ontology * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ Agenda Matthias: today we have two external presentations: one from Konca Minolta and another one related to the WoT ontology ... we need a press realise and a blog post etc. to show the WG started to work - there will be a meeting organized Matthias: there exist 4 mailing lists at the moment. We need to reduce a number of emails by organizing the communication. <McCool> anyhow, I was going to say we discussing creating an Editor's mailing list (actually, will have Editors and Chairs) <McCool> specifically to cover organizational topics related to editing the drafts Matthias: for instance we can publish first on the members-only WG list, and once we have an agreement or a proposal, then we can publish it on the public mailing list. <McCool> generally better to use github issues for "sticky" topics kajimoto: I would like to create a mailing list for the architecture deliverable. Matthias: this is an old issue: mailing list vs. GitHub issue Presentation from Konica Minolta Presenter: Matej Dusik Presenter II: Carlos A Velasco project "Cognitive Hub" presented jhund: very interesting presentation. What kind of protocols do you support? What kind of Things can be connected to? Matej Dusik: we would like to support the W3C WoT Matej Dusik: different Things can be connected over our semantic platform Matej Dusik: we are currently driven by different use cases Carlos: introducing himself, we are working on topics like semantics, WoT Matthias: you are invited to give a short presentation on your work, activities etc. <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to ask if Matej can send these slides to the group list kaz: Matej, could you please send the presented slides? Matej: yes. Matthias: why did you choose Lora. Matej: Low maintenance, low power jhund: you are invited to participate in our Plug Fests to test the interoperability <McCool> never mind, stupid network The WoT Ontology Matthias: Since Fernando is not present, we will skip the presentation Jhund: we have a new repo. Zoltan will provide a strawman for the ED, we still no access yet. Email notification will be provided. <kaz> [10]Scripting minutes [10] https://www.w3.org/2017/02/20-wot-minutes.html jhund: IG space will be merged with the new repo and the current content will be freezed, and a visitor will be forwarded to the new repo. Matthias: we should delete the old (current) content in order not to confuse visitors (it will not be deleted anyway, in case it is needed). <McCool> McCool: beside moving "normative" details out, I think we also need to work on outlines for each document kajimoto: I have updateed the architecture document (from the IG work) to be used in the WG Matthias: we should ensure that the most recent template is used in docs <kaz> [11]wot architecture tentative area [11] https://github.com/w3c/wotwg/tree/master/architecture <kaz> [12]wot architecture final area [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture Matthias: in the work on the architecture we want to cover, apart from device to clould comm., also other scenarious, e.g., Thing to Thing interactions etc. Currently we don't have a separate call for the architecture work, email communication is crrently used. Carlos: could we organize the work more clearly regarding where and how to contribute? Matthias: the input has been inhereted from the IG. We now use the WG list. <inserted> [ all the 4 deliverable documents (WoT Architecture, TD, Scripting, Binding Templates) are WG deliverables, so should be handle on the WG side. ] Presenters: Maria and Fernando Maria: we extracted requirements from the Current Practise document, and provided an OWL ontology and HTML documentation for the ontology ... the outcome is online and avilable for comments mjkoster: how to link this ontology with other domain specific ontologies? Maria: we will work on showing how to use the ontology w.r.t example use cases sebastian: small modifications are needed to be align with the current TD model. ... shall we consider the work as a starting work for the model representation? ... Maria, you are invited to the TD discussion on the basic model. <cvelasco_Fraunhofer> Sorry, I have to leave <McCool> I don't think there is any particular reason to try to divorce things from RDF <McCool> at least its basic "triples" methodology Yongjing: if take this as a starting work on the basic model representation, then we should be aware that this representation is bound to RDF <McCool> but not really to any specific serialization; that indeed should not matter, but I don't see evidence it does <McCool> anyhow, I don't think we want to reinvent semantic technologies; we want to build on what's there already <McCool> useful <-> what are the use cases? <McCool> eg. validation, bridging, etc. Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [13]scribe.perl version 1.148 ([14]CVS log) $Date: 2017/02/27 07:59:06 $ [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 27 February 2017 10:42:02 UTC