W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > September 2021

[PlugFest/Testing] minutes - 24 July 2021

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 05:24:39 +0900
Message-ID: <87ilylkbqw.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2021/07/14-wot-pf-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Ege!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                                Testing

14 July 2021

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/07/14-wot-pf-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Ege_Korkan, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima

   Regrets
          -

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          Ege

Contents

    1. [3]Minutes Review
    2. [4]Planning

Meeting minutes

  Minutes Review

   <kaz> [5]June-18

      [5] https://www.w3.org/2021/06/18-wot-pf-minutes.html

   McCool: any objections to publish?
   … does not seem like it

  Planning

   McCool: we do not have much time left since people go on
   holidays in august

   McCool: What is the rule for the new changes?

   Kaz: if all the existing implementations can still process our
   old TDs, we can reuse the results for the v1.1 implementation
   reports, but I'm a bit concerned about possible degrading.

   McCool: we have some members that are not active

   Ege: I have talked and one of them is actually just californium

   McCool: cool, that means that we should reorganize the
   specifications

   McCool: we also have 3 categories. describer, Thing, consumer

   McCool: we also need 2 implementations for optional features

   McCool: we should reorganize the old testing repo

   Ege: we need the implementation report of each specification to
   have its data in its repository

   McCool: so not using the wot-testing?

   Ege: no I mean that during the testing phases, until
   publication, we work on the wot-testing directory
   … and then move results to the respective spec's repository

   Kaz: whichever is fine, having the testing resources under
   wot-testing or under each spec's repo
   ... but currently, the structure of each spec is kind of messy,
   so it might be better to have all the testing resources under
   wot-testing with a clearer structure
   ... in any case, we should not overwrite the ver. 1.0
   implementation report given it's referred to from the REC
   documents

   McCool: ok

   [adjourned]


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [6]scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC).

      [6] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 27 September 2021 20:24:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 27 September 2021 20:24:49 UTC