- From: Ben Francis <ben@krellian.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:14:13 +0000
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wot-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADKQpGRUT4aTpjDH1gZ9jY8nbVgZ0Z2UYEp0TNN=SWtO95jAXA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dave, Thank you for sharing this information. I'm very interested in any potential collaboration with the CDBB and am happy to assist in any way I can in exploring how WoT standards could be applied to the UK's national digital twin programme. Please feel free to make an introduction if I can be of any assistance. Ben On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 16:00, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > This email is in relation to the potential relationship between the Web of > Things as an abstraction layer for digital twins, and work on smart cities > to expose digital twins for the built environment. Wikipedia defines > the built environment as including all of the physical parts of where we > live and work (e.g. homes, buildings, streets, open spaces, and > infrastructure). The built environment influences a person's level of > physical activity. > > I had a call yesterday with Peter El Hajj, Matthew West and James > Hetherington to learn about the UK's national digital twin programme [1]. > This is run by the Centre for Digital Built Britain, a partnership between > the University of Cambridge and the UK Department for Business, Energy and > Industrial Strategy. Launched by HM Treasury in July 2018, the NDTp was set > up to deliver key recommendations of the National Infrastructure > Commission’s 2017 'Data for the Public Good Report’ [2]. They also referred > me to the Gemini Principles [3] which focuses on information management > across the built environment. The DT Hub itself is available at [4]. There > are some introductory videos on [1]. > > The idea is essentially to provide a national framework for secure data > sharing where the data isn’t necessarily free, but must be available on > reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions. Matthew West > explained that they had a framework of ontologies to encourage semantic > interoperability. > > This raises the question of whether W3C’s Web of Things is a good fit to > the kinds of digital twins that cities expect to expose. Matthew committed > to sharing information of their use cases and requirements. I offered to > help them with any questions on WoT. > > p.s. we also discussed ideas on simplifying semantic technologies for the > average developer and I pointed them at the W3C chunks data and rules > format [5]. This part of a framework for general purpose human-like AI for > digital transformation. I will present this to the upcoming Siemens IoT > conference. > > [1] https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/what-we-do/national-digital-twin-programme > [2] > https://www.nic.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Data-for-the-Public-Good-NIC-Report.pdf > > [3] https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/DFTG/GeminiPrinciples > [4] https://digitaltwinhub.co.uk/ > [5] https://w3c.github.io/cogai/ > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things > > > > > -- Ben Francis Founder Krellian Ltd. <https://krellian.com>
Received on Monday, 8 March 2021 13:14:38 UTC