- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:47:08 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2021/01/25-wot-sec-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Elena! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ WoT Security 25 January 2021 [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Security_WebConf#25_January_2021 [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/01/25-wot-sec-irc Attendees Present Cristiano_Aguzzi, Elena_Reshetova, Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Oliver_Pfaff, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets - Chair McCool Scribe elena Contents 1. [4]meeting minutes from last meeting 2. [5]let's look at the issue tracker 3. [6]Apikey and psk explanation improvement 4. [7]add URI template location for security scheme parameters Meeting minutes <McCool> [8]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/ IG_Security_WebConf#25_January_2021 [8] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Security_WebConf#25_January_2021 meeting minutes from last meeting [9]https://www.w3.org/2021/01/18-wot-sec-minutes.html [9] https://www.w3.org/2021/01/18-wot-sec-minutes.html McCool: date needs to be corrected McCool, any objections to the meeting minutes? McCool: approved let's look at the issue tracker McCool: looking at issue 191 [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/191 - Review security architecture of Home Assistant [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/191 McCool: let's capture the important points from this issue into our wot-security documentation McCool creates wot-security/background/hubs.md and puts text from issue 191 there [11]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/blob/master/background/ hubs.md [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/blob/master/background/hubs.md McCool: now issue 191 can be closed. McCool closes issue 191 McCool: other similar issues should contribute text in a form of PR towards background/hubs McCool: look at issue 187 [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/187 - Review security architecture of OpenHAB [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/187 McCool: adding text from issue 187 to background/hubs.md McCool: we would need to have template for describing different hubs McCool: we will leave the issue 187 open for now in case Oliver wants to make further edits Apikey and psk explanation improvement McCool: next let look into issues from agenda First one: [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/ pull/1031 - Improve descriptions of apikey and psk security schemes [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1031 McCool: in TD call last week we discussed this McCool: the new description seems to address the original issue, but we need to covert a couple of statements to assertions McCool: how do people feel about making it an assertion? Cristiano: agrees with this approach albeit testing this assertion is a problem McCool puts some comment into the issue including the potential wording for the assertions McCool: the important statement is to make sure that if someone stores secret information (like keys, passwords, etc) in a TD, then they are automatically not compliant with the TD spec McCool: we will discuss this at next TD call add URI template location for security scheme parameters [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1032 - WIP: Add URI template location for security scheme parameters [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1032 McCool: this text is not quite ready yet McCool: we can use uriVariables instead of uri and parameters here McCool puts a comment into 1032 together with an example on how it can look like McCool: If anyone has more comments, please comment also <kaz> [adjourned] Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [15]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC). [15] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 8 February 2021 11:47:15 UTC