- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:00:04 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/09/02-wot-pf-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
WoT Plugfest/Testing
02 Sep 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_09.02.2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Cristiano_Aguzzi,
Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura,
Ryuichi_Matsukura, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
cris_
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Review agenda
2. [5]GitHub issues
* [6]Summary of Action Items
* [7]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
Review agenda
McCool: is anybody have any PR or other things ?
<Ege> [8]TUM devices online
[8] https://esiremotelab.esi.ei.tum.de/
Ege: (mentions TUM's online devices
now our devices are live
... we also have a live camera feed
McCool: do you have the link?
Ege: sure
... we also probably publish just a link to these TDs
McCool: could you please add that link in the repo ?
... we have three weeks to organize
... so we really need to fill these TDs
... also a directory is really critical
... aside from the directory service do you have any other
tools?
... or a proxy service?
Matsukura: yeah we have a proxy service
McCool: we should document that in the tool folder, but maybe
we can create a more specific folder where to describe this
... please use the created md file to document your services
GitHub issues
<kaz> [9]Issue 47
[9] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47
McCool: I believe we'll have SPARQL support in our TDD so it is
better that TDs will be annotated with semantic tags
... we'll annotate them using ODM semantics
<kaz> [10]Issue 39
[10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/39
Ege: I think I fixed #39, It probably was a problem in the
ontology
... it wasn't a failure in the context, you have to look
specifically if it was there or not
... I mean we hadn't tests for this scenario
McCool: so I'll the issue open to track this need
Ege: issue 43 it is some ideas bring from wot
McCool: it is quite old, it is from two years ago
... it is a long document and I am not sure if the content is
really meaningful
<kaz> [11]Issue 43
[11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/43
Ege: I liked the outcomes mentioned in the original issue. The
sentence used there are pretty marketable . we should use them
McCool: please, extract the useful stuff and put in the
marketing repo.
Ege: Ok, but I think we should do this after each plugfest
... I mean reporting the good outcomes.
McCool: ok I marked the issue as outcome
... issue #44 is too pretty old. I feel that we can close the
issue
<kaz> [12]Issue 44
[12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/44
<kaz> [13]Issue 45
[13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/45
McCool: issue 45 is missing the text. I'm comping the
referenced text
... it seems that is not really an issue
Ege: it is similar to 43. it is just an outcome
McCool: I'll create a label just for that: informative
... plugfest outcome is too informative
... Ok I have another meeting. I think we need to collect TDs
as quickly as possible
<kaz> [adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version ([15]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/09/23 06:59:05 $
[14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 07:00:12 UTC