- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:01:30 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/02/05-wot-pf-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Ege!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WoT-PlugFest/Testing
05 Feb 2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Ege_Korkan,
Kunihiko_Toumura, Takahisa_Suzuki, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
Ryuichi_Matsukura
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
ege, egekorkan
Contents
* [2]Topics
* [3]Summary of Action Items
* [4]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kaz> scribenick: ege
McCool: Monday, met with the Thing to Thing Research Group
... in order to meet in Helsinki
... talk about multiple themes with them
... update from MKoster on chip and other consortiums(?)
... reach out the ICWE organizers
... to have an information night, during the conference
Ege: make sure that you don't conflict the social events
McCool: they have WoT in the agenda
<McCool>
[5]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_6-11_June_2020,_
Helsinki#Plugfest
[5] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_6-11_June_2020,_Helsinki#Plugfest
McCool: (explaining a paragraph on the wiki about plugfests)
... we would need marketing for the workshop
... I have to send the budget to Intel to get financing
... need to hire a guard
... (gives cost of different items for the F2F)
... zoltan will test the internet related aspects the week
before so send your requirements
[6]http://plugfest.thingweb.io/playground/
[6] http://plugfest.thingweb.io/playground/
Ege: new version of playground is available
McCool: we need a plugfest specific version of the
implementation report
Ege: we need to use thing implementation and consumer
implementation all the time, when we are talking about
interoperability
McCool: we would need a csv file as a result of a test to
capture this
... (shows an interoperability table between intel and hitachi)
... I have the tooling set up to generate a matrix but we need
to decide what it means to pass an interoperability test
Ege: a column for each operation type would be good
Kaz: from w3c point of view, testing means specifications
implementability
(Michael McCool has problem with audio connection)
<kaz> kaz: we should once clearly define all those three
testing categories separately, and think about which includes
what kind of testing, and then clarify which test assertions
are derived from which specification documents
<kaz> scribenick: egekorkan
<kaz> kaz: "interoperability testing" should include both the
client side (consumer) and the server side (producer), and we
need to show concrete data transfer between them
<McCool> "there is a glitch in connecting to the webex
service... please try again later"
<McCool> we are at the end of the hour anyway, so let's just
call it a day
<McCool> anyway, please look at the wiki page, etc.
<McCool> and I will work on the tooling as described
<McCool> and we can continue discussing features etc next week
<McCool> any other business?
<kaz> just would like us all to remember we should clarify each
category of "Testing" here :)
<McCool> sure, that was my intent
<McCool> "Conformance" is what is normally meant by testing in
W3C
<McCool> "Interoperability" is additional testing for pairs of
implementations working together
<McCool> ok, anyway, let's adjourn, if there isn't anything
else...
adjourned
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [7]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([8]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/02/06 11:25:11 $
[7] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[8] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 14:01:41 UTC