- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:12:51 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9W1XeOX8tckineOBWZOzTdn2anYCA5G9XsB7iOoVFMBrA@mail.gmail.com>
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2019/11/14-wot-marketing-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Dave!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WoT Marketing
14 Nov 2019
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Ege_Korkan,
Daniel_Peintner, Taki_Kamiya, David_Ezell, Dave_Raggett,
dsr, Ryuchi_Matsukura
Regrets
Sebastian_Kaebisch
Chair
Ege
Scribe
dsr
Contents
* [2]Topics
1. [3]Issue 19
2. [4]Issue 17
3. [5]Issue 18
4. [6]Issue 2
5. [7]Issue 19 (revisited)
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kaz> scribenick: dsr
Issue 19
<ege> [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/19
[10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/19
Daniel's draft email to be sent to Coralie (head of W3C comms)
This is about finding out the MarComm Team's plans and timeline
for the website redesign, and sharing what we are hoping to do
for the WoT pages
Kaz: the website redesign work is still at a very early stage,
we should collect our suggestions for the WoT IG/WG and pass
them on to Coralie
... note that once we've got a consensus about the resolution,
the one of the co-Chairs should send it to the W3C MarComm Team
McCool: Sebastian should take the lead on that
Daniel: the URI is publicly available for the website redesign
RFP
... we should seek feedback on our plans rather than waiting
for the website redesign to be done
Kaz: one question is around what kinds of tools we should be
using
... My point is purely procedural, and concerns checking with
Coralie if we can continue our discussion on the public github
about this point
... probably okay, but want to hear from her first
... Sebastian can send his email once we hear back from
Coralie, re use of public github pages
Issue 17
<inserted> [11]Issue 17
[11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/17
Ege: we may want to have a WoT twitter account
... It is important to reach a wider audience
<ege> [12]https://twitter.com/csswg
[12] https://twitter.com/csswg
Dave asks if Ege means an account or a hashtag
Ege: I mean an account
... Open question is how to open the account, not clear which
is the best way to go
Daniel: we should check with CSS WG for how their account was
created
... I would prefer a W3C official account
Kaz: this would be managed by the W3C MarComm team first
... we can chat with the CSS group for their advice on
practical aspects after talking with the MarComm Team
Ege: is our contact Naomi or Coralie?
Kaz: we can talk to Naomi and ask her to transfer our message to
Coralie, but the Chair can send our message directly to
w3t-comm list with the whole WoT IG/WG feedback
Ege: I propose we bring the twitter account idea to the main
call next Wednesday
[no objections]
Issue 18
[13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/18 covers
chronology of WoT standardisation
[13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/18
with a history of important events, e.g. publication of WD,
workshops, ...
for use in any web page where appropriate
Ege: I would need help if we agree to move this forward
Taki: I agree that this would be important
Taki offers to help Ege to fill out the list of events by year
Dave: we should provide a brief summary for each listed event
Ege: should we close these issues and continue the discussion
on the template?
Daniel: we can close issue 9
Dave: my concern was what we need to do in the very short term
Kaz: right. We should clarify what we want to do
Ege: one example is the table on the WG page
Daniel: the date of the last REC track draft is much more
important than the FPWD
RESOLUTION: Daniel to propose changes for W3C staff contacts to
apply
Dave: for the /WoT/ page we should provide a concise status for
the IG/WG at the top
... I think we were requested to add the link for joining the
IG on this page
<kaz> kaz: +1 to add the link for joining the groups within the
left column or the center column
(McCool leaves
Issue 2
<ege> [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/2
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/2
<ege>
[15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/posts/draf
t/2019-10-tpac-update.md
[15]
https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/blob/master/posts/draft/2019-10-tpac-update.md
Dave: we should get Michael's blog on the IG page and the main
W3C blog
Ege asks Dave to insert the text from the TPAC update to the
current IG page via WordPress admin
Dave to copy the content to the W3C blog on behalf of the IG/WG
Issue 19 (revisited)
Daniel: is it now okay to ask Sebastian to proceed with
gathering feedback to send to Coralie
<Zakim> kaz, you wanted to report that Coralie is OK with
siting the RFP document
Kaz: yes
... we need to summarise the feedback from the whole IG/WG
before sending it to MarComm
Dave: this task force should prepare some material for the mail
call to discuss
Perhaps Ege could do this with Daniel's help?
Kaz summarises the process to follow
Another possibility is for the main call to approve devolving
all responsibility to the marketing task force
Ege: the Task force should be able to update the pages without
requiring prior approval from the main call in each case
Ege to propose agenda request for next Wednesday's main call,
along with some supporting material
[adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
1. [16]Daniel to propose changes for W3C staff contacts to
apply
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([18]CVS log)
$Date: 2019/11/15 08:09:24 $
[17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 15 November 2019 08:13:35 UTC