- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 21:19:28 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2019/07/01-wot-sec-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks, Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WoT-Security 01 Jul 2019 Attendees Present Michael_McCool, Kaz_Ashimura, Elena_Reshetova, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets Chair McCool Scribe kaz Contents * [2]Topics 1. [3]TAG and PING 2. [4]Remaining PR 3. [5]Remaining Issues 4. [6]TAG comments 5. [7]PING minutes 6. [8]Previous minutes 7. [9]Publication * [10]Summary of Action Items * [11]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ TAG and PING [12]Agenda [12] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Security_WebConf#Agenda [13]June-20 PING minutes [13] https://www.w3.org/Privacy/IG/summaries/PING-minutes-20190620 McCool: we need to identify what to do ... some feedback from David Baron so far ... but that's not an official TAG review yet ... I re-read the comments and also the Architecture draft ... but think there is some misunderstanding and confusion ... need some clarification Kaz: maybe we can create an issue on our repo? ... anyway, I'll talk with PLH about the next steps today Remaining PR [14]PR 133 [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/pull/133 Elena: fix SVG diagrams directly? McCool: yes, please do so ... using Inkscape, etc. ... should we merge this PR itself? ... using PowerPoint is OK but using some free software would be better Kaz: would agree :) McCool: let's merge this for now but if we have time, let's convert the diagrams to SVG (no objections) McCool: (merges PR 133) Remaining Issues [15]Issue 132 [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/132 McCool: close Issue 132 [16]Issue 130 [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/130 McCool: close Issue 130 [17]Issue 129 [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/129 McCool: skims the WoT Architecture at: [18]https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/ ... can close Issue 129 ... (and close Issue 129) [18] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/ [19]Issue 126 [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/126 McCool: done? Elena: yes McCool: (close Issue 126) [20]Issue 125 [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/125 McCool: should review terminology separately later [21]Issue 123 [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/123 Elena: general term is "intermidiary" McCool: probably still open ... let's leave it ... simplest resolution is removing the extra definitions of security and privacy within the Architecture document ... (creates a new issue) [22]Issue 134 [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/134 TAG comments [23]David's comment [23] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/355#issuecomment-505228840 McCool: (looking at the following block) Also a few thoughts on the security and privacy considerations which I've reviewed somewhat quickly: * The idea that thing descriptions shouldn't carry identifying information seems over-optimistic to me. It seems like (at least from the perspective of smart home use cases) thing descriptions are likely to have a significant amount of sensitive and identifiable information (although it might not be initially obvious how the information is sensitive), and systems need to be designed appropriately. * The opening sentences of the section on software update (before the "Mitigation:") appear to suggest that avoiding having a software update system at all would be the best mitigation. While it's absolutely true that designing a secure software update system must be done carefully, experience has shown that having prompt software update to mitigate security vulnerabilities is essential for internet-connected devices, and (see The evergreen Web finding) essential for the progress of the Web. ]] McCool: we can create an issue on our repo [24]Issue 135 [24] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/135 Kaz: note that the TAG guys are looking at the old version we provided in March ... so we can mention the latest version is available on GitHub at: [25]https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/ [25] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/ McCool: some changes ... anyway, we need clarification for the first comment ... regarding the second comment, maybe we can add some clarification on our side Elena: when/how to respond? McCool: we're still waiting for the official conclusion from TAG PING minutes [26]PING minutes [26] https://www.w3.org/Privacy/IG/summaries/PING-minutes-20190620 McCool: we can read through this (and read through the PING minutes) McCool: (and creates an issue on wot-security repo) [27]Issue 136 [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/136 Previous minutes McCool: let's review the previous minutes next time Publication McCool: publication of the Note? Kaz: we can check the document using the Checkers and publish it using Echidna once it's ready for publication McCool: ok ... think the terminology issue 123 is blocking ... we should try to address this asas we can push out an update Kaz: +1 McCool: might be fixed already, and may want to use "intermediary" to be consistent with the Architecture doc [adjourned] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [28]scribe.perl version 1.154 ([29]CVS log) $Date: 2019/07/29 12:15:04 $ [28] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [29] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 29 July 2019 12:20:33 UTC