- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:05:48 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Hi all, Darko was not available and there were just Koster, McCool, Taki and myself during the LD call on June 8, so we didn't have an official call but had some chat as follows. Thanks a lot for taking these notes, Taki! Kazuyuki --- from here --- Present: Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool, Taki_Kamiya, Kaz_Ashimura Chair: Koster Scribe: Taki Koster: Originally on the agenda was: How to use external ontology such as semantic annotation using iotschema.org, and discussion on recommended patterns for using FoI (Feature of Interest). Koster: How JSON-LD Frame works. Has someone taken a look at it how it works exactly? If not, we need to have some to take a look at it closely. McCool: JSON-LD Playground. TD Validation is using JSON schema for syntactic checking. I already rewrote JSON schema halfway based on the latest TD draft spec. I encountered an issue. When importing external security schemes, validation needs to take that into account. Such as enumerated values. new scheme name needs to be allowed in enumeration, for example. Koster: WISHI telecon. WoT IG/WG exercises PlugFest according to our own plan. WISHI PlugFest uses WoT PlugFest as the starting point, and build research on top of it. With regards to on-line PlugFest, WISHI has assigned no action items. WISHI is volunteer-based activity. Next WISHI Face-to-Face meeting will be 14th-15th of July in Montreal. McCool: SHACL tooling. TD validation is also using SHACL for certain purposes. Not very clear about available toolset for processing/using SHACL. Is the toolset as powerful as those of JSON Schema? Some WoT members may be more knowledgeable on this, including Dave, Darko and Victor. Koster: schema.org, including iotschema.org is discussing to use shape constraints (SHACL). Tool development is part of the discussion. McCool: A practical approach is SHACL to JSON Schema generation. This is practical and useful. It should merge in all contexts, and generate JSON Schema. Koster: I also want to use OCF, ZigBee as well as iotschema.org definitions. JSON schema is mainly for validation payload. We can use RDF to describe OCF and generate JSON schema, for example. This kind of higher-level tooling is useful and important. McCool: There is a Korea F2F agenda item for discussing testing tools. Koster: We should also allocate time for discussing shapes validation. McCool: One hour testing tool discussion, and 15 minutes shapes validation discussion as part of it. Koster: That is good. Let's make sure to have it on agenda. Hopefully, Dahn can also join the meeting. McCool: Online PlugFest should also be an agenda point. When a light is on, how can we know about it? Device simulation is useful in this case. Koster: The idea of Digital Twin is also based on proxy and model. McCool: Semantic annotation can help simulation. Koster: Generic testing API for all TDs will also be useful. McCool: For example, when node.wot is run in testing mode, one way is to make it so that it automatically can turn on testing APIs such as for observability, controllability (such as triggering events, etc.). --- to here ---
Received on Monday, 11 June 2018 06:07:02 UTC