- From: Mccool, Michael <michael.mccool@intel.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:31:12 +0000
- To: Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
- CC: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 30 September 2017 11:31:41 UTC
Does seem to be a lot of overlap with iot.schema.org<http://iot.schema.org>. Anyhow, he pinged me on LinkedIn. He does not mention WoT in his articles, though (unless I overlooked it) but he still has one more article to go... I'd like to at least get him to work in a mention ;) Michael On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com<mailto:michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>> wrote: Oh yeah, I was approached by Doug Migliori last June to contribute to this series and had some email exchange but somehow dropped the ball. I also work with a number of the other authors already but no one has mentioned it. I have contacted him and asked if we can talk about W3C WoT and iotschema.org<http://iotschema.org> in the next installment. They seem to be headed off toward a common API and data format (meta-platform) approach... Best regards, Michael On Sep 29, 2017, at 5:02 AM, Mccool, Michael <michael.mccool@intel.com<mailto:michael.mccool@intel.com>> wrote: Of likely interest to the group. Semantic interop for IoT, including a nice review of several groups' work in the area. Six-part series, only five parts published so far as far as I can tell. http://www.embedded-computing.com/semantic-interop/cross-industry-semantic-interoperability-part-one#
Received on Saturday, 30 September 2017 11:31:41 UTC