- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:28:03 +0900
- To: Public Web of Things IG <public-wot-ig@w3.org>, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-wot-sec-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking these minutes, Uday!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WoT IG - Security
04 Sep 2017
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Security_WebConf#Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/04-wot-sec-irc
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimrua, Michale_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
Uday_Davuluru, Zoltan_Kis, Elena_Reshetova,
Michale_Koster
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
uday
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Issues and next steps
2. [6]NDSS workshop
* [7]Summary of Action Items
* [8]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kaz> scribenick: uday
Issues and next steps
McCool: Discusses issues and next steps
... starting with the discussion on pull request 349
<kaz> [9]https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/349 pull request 349
has just been merged
[9] https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/349
Elena: TD privacy and TD local storage updated
... Security consideration section: goal is to use this to
adopt security scenario and build one's own security objects
McCool: might get a conflict issue
<kaz> Kaz: a quick question
<kaz> ... do you want to commit this by Wednesday (=finalizing
the whole group review)?
<kaz> Elena: this is not ready for commit and need more
discussion
Kaz: can we include this in architecture doc
McCool: no time till the first public draft
... need security repo
Elena: can have a single big document or sub documents
McCool: lengthy document might overshadow topics
... threat model and security consideration can be put into one
doc
... privacy is missing in the doc, need to add this
Elena: started to add privacy related threats in threat model
itself
... explains privacy with examples
<kaz> McCool: would try a vote. anybody object to have a
separate document for "WoT Security and Privacy Consideration"?
McCool: do anyone objects separate deliverable for WoT security
considerations
Elena: need to highlight important parts
McCool: agree
... need to separate implementation details
... we should create new doc under WoT repo and have a security
repo in parallel
Kaz: can create a separate repo if needed
<kaz> ... "wot-security"?
McCool: wot-security would be a good name
Kaz: need to use repo manager to publish
<kaz> Kaz: as part of the normative WG deliverables? if so we
need to use the repository manager as well
<kaz> McCool: should be an informative deliverable, e.g., a WG
Note
McCool: normative and informative parts of security
smilar to WoT architecture repo
how do we publish security?
shall we make security as a separate doc instead of merging in
architecture doc
<kaz> because the description would become long
McCool: how do people handle this in another groups
Kaz: maybe with separate normative doc
McCool: don't want to ember all security stuff in architecture
doc
Kaz: makes sense to start with informative note and decide with
the chairs call
McCool: will also create hyperlink between docs
<McCool> McCool: we will aim for a separate security document,
"WoT Security and Privacy Considerations"
<McCool> we'll talk to the editors/chairs to confirm this
<McCool> the document will be informative, but published in
such a way (note) that we can hyperlink to sections from the
other documents
<McCool> ideally, we would have it in its own repo, parallel to
the wot-architecture
<McCool> proposed name: wot-security
McCool: security in architecture doc clan up
<kaz>
[10]https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/#security-considerat
ions
[10] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/#security-considerations
<zkis> [11]https://zolkis.github.io/wot-scripting-api/
[11] https://zolkis.github.io/wot-scripting-api/
ZK: already made a PR, can see on my gitthub page
<kaz> [12]https://w3c.github.io/wot-scripting-api/#security
[12] https://w3c.github.io/wot-scripting-api/#security
<kaz> McCool: should read "The security section is under
development and will be completed later."
<kaz> ... on the other hand, there is a link to the threat
model in the TD draft
<kaz>
[13]https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#threat-model
[13] https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#threat-model
<kaz> Kaz: do we want to update the Architecture/Scripting API
as well with the detailed description?
<kaz> ... or ok to publish them asis?
<kaz> McCool: publishing them with the minimum description now
is ok
thanks for the filling kaz
<kaz> ... but would like to remove "More general discussion of
overall security of a Thing (for example, best practices for
WoT Interface design) can be found in the WoT Architecture
document. " from the "7. Security Consideration" section of the
TD draft
<kaz>
[14]https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#security-consi
deration
[14] https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#security-consideration
<kaz> McCool: and also for the architecture document
<kaz> ... the Editor's note at "8. Security Considerations"
<kaz> ... Security and privacy considerations are under
development
<kaz> ... and remove "For now, only the sub-section headings
are included to indicate the roadmap for the WoT Architecture
security considerations."
<kaz> rsagent, make log public
<kaz> [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues
<kaz> github issues for architecture above
<kaz> McCool: add "Please see work in progress at WoT Security
and Privacy."
<kaz> ... linking to:
[16]https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/security-privacy
[16] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/security-privacy
<kaz> ... (creates a pull request on his own repo; and will
create a pull request on the main repo)
<kaz> ... next
<kaz> ... Elena, if you can take out an overview on W3C WoT
security and privacy
<kaz> ... copy the framework from the WoT Architecture document
McCool: next steps: ER to create new doc under WoT Security and
privacy and start general documentation
MM to make sure the draft is clean
<kaz> Elena: regrets for the next call (Sp. 11)
<kaz> McCool: if you can send a link to your repo, I can make a
pull request
NDSS workshop
<kaz> McCool: worked on the proposal
McCool: proposal submitted to NDSS
<kaz> McCool: deadlines:
<kaz> ... cfp 25 sep 2017
<kaz> ... now done and in the pipe
<kaz> ... focused on standards
<kaz> ... review of existing standards
<kaz> ... including but not limited to W3C standards
<kaz> ... will be held in February
<kaz> Elena: paper deadline too close?
<kaz> McCool: we should discuss that
<kaz> ... notice to authors: 15 Jan 2018
<kaz> ... not expecting a big paper, just 1-3 pages
<kaz> ... publication-ready papers: 1 Feb. 2018
<kaz> [ adjourned ]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version
1.152 ([18]CVS log)
$Date: 2017/09/04 15:26:27 $
[17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 4 September 2017 15:29:16 UTC