Makes sense to me. In addition to node-wot, there are a number of other services and utilities that would be useful to distribute, starting with the thing-directory implementation (I hope that is one of the things you are considering) but also local system services/things, meta-data translators (eg the OCF metadata bridge that I am working on would be a candidate), semantic tooling, and so forth.
Michael McCool
From: Kovatsch, Matthias [mailto:matthias.kovatsch@siemens.com]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 19:22
To: public-wot-ig <public-wot-ig@w3.org>; public-wot-wg@w3.org
Subject: W3C WoT proposal at the Eclipse Foundation: Thingweb
Dear all
You might have heard that we want to position the node-wot reference implementation at the Eclipse Foundation within the IoT Working Group ("Eclipse IoT", https://iot.eclipse.org/). We now proposed an umbrella project called "Thingweb" that is intended to group to a versatile W3C WoT toolbox with Servient implementations in different languages, tooling, etc.
Please have a look at the proposal and leave a comment when you support it:
https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/thingweb
Best wishes,
Matthias
Received on Monday, 30 October 2017 04:23:54 UTC