- From: Robert Gallas <gallas.robert@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 19:12:06 +0200
- To: "Charpenay, Victor" <victor.charpenay@siemens.com>
- Cc: "Peintner, Daniel (ext)" <daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com>, "public-wot-ig@w3.org" <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+wjrqozyDNdQtH7SJAXec1ze=7AoFzkBrVjoisFw46951yDbw@mail.gmail.com>
YANG model in pull request https://github.com/conas/wot/pull/2 On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Charpenay, Victor < victor.charpenay@siemens.com> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > > there was one point that is maybe not clearly exposed in the proposal: the > type definition should be embeddable in a Thing Description, meaning > serializing it in JSON should be possible. Is it the case with YANG? If > not, please add it in the “Note” column. > > > > Thanks for your contribution. > > > > Regards, > > Victor > > > > *From:* Robert Gallas [mailto:gallas.robert@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 20:57 > *To:* Peintner, Daniel (ext) (CT RDA NEC EMB-DE) > *Cc:* public-wot-ig@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: YANG inspirations for TD > > > > Hi Daniel > > > > I'll add new column for YANG to the comparison table. > > > > Robert > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Peintner, Daniel (ext) < > daniel.peintner.ext@siemens.com> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > A modeling language can be useful on different levels. > One aspect we we have been looking at was "how" to describe datatypes. An > initial comparison can be found here: > https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/proposals/type-system > > YANG is on the list to be reviewed. It seems that you have experience with > YANG. Do you think you can add information about YANG and enrich the > comparison table? > > Would be really helpful! > > Thanks, > > -- Daniel > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Von:* Robert Gallas [gallas.robert@gmail.com] > *Gesendet:* Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 08:41 > *An:* public-wot-ig@w3.org > *Betreff:* YANG inspirations for TD > > Hi all, > > > > There is and ongoing discussion about thing description (TD). I'd like to > point community to YANG modelling language ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/ > rfc6020 ) . YANG is built to address very same requirements as TD. It has > updatable properties, rpc`s, event streams, data types etc. > > > > However even YANG is complex language and out of W3C standards it has some > interesting concepts which can serve as an inspiration for next TD version. > I mean mainly: > > > > - hierachical data model (helps in model maintainability and supports > contexts) > > - value constraints (great help at UI generation, widget design and > reduces network traffic) > > - interaction types concept (good for extensibility) > > > > Hope helps a bit. > > > > Robert > > >
Received on Monday, 10 October 2016 17:12:35 UTC