Re: Comparative study of IoT architectures?

Thanks for the pointer - it sounds like we have sufficient interest to include a comparative study of IoT architectures in our architecture deliverable. 

On a separate topic, how does the web browser discover the CHIRIMEN device?  

Some companies have indicated an interest in being able to install web of things apps into home gateways based upon open web standards for such apps. It could be interesting to look at a web platform for JavaScript based apps that combines the app facing APIs we’ve been discussing in this IG along with the work being done in the Web Apps WG on manifest and service workers.  Is this also something of interest to you? 

> On 18 May 2016, at 02:05, Satoru Takagi <sa-takagi@kddi.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave-san,
> We CHIRIMEN Open Hardware Project published a slide titled "CHIRIMEN open hardware became open source (English)"*1
> Page 6 to 12 of this slide mentions with a relationship with the reference architecture of M2M,IoT of ISO and ITU. It may be useful for you.
> 
> *1: http://www.slideshare.net/totipalmate/chirimen-open-hardware-became-open-source-english
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Satoru Takagi
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
>> Many IoT organisations have worked on architectures, e.g. Industrial Internet Consortium, IEEE P2413, ISO/IEC JTC 1/WG 10, AIOTI, and of course us.  Given that we’re positioning the W3C as defining inter-platform standards, it would make sense for us to try to relate these different architectures.  Where should this work be written up?   For instance, the technology landscape document, the Web of Things architecture document, or perhaps something new?
>> 
>> Can we add this as an agenda item for the IG call.
>> 
>> Many thanks,
>> —
>>   Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

—
   Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>