W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Comparative study of IoT architectures?

From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 16:14:03 +0530
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <573AF5F3.9090509@eurecom.fr>
In my opinion, the comparative study should be in the WoT arch doc as a 
state-of-the-art study.

Soumya

Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 |
https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

On 17-05-2016 16:01, Dave Raggett wrote:
> Many IoT organisations have worked on architectures, e.g. Industrial 
> Internet Consortium, IEEE P2413, ISO/IEC JTC 1/WG 10, AIOTI, and of 
> course us.  Given that we’re positioning the W3C as defining 
> inter-platform standards, it would make sense for us to try to relate 
> these different architectures.  Where should this work be written up? 
>   For instance, the technology landscape document, the Web of Things 
> architecture document, or perhaps something new?
>
> Can we add this as an agenda item for the IG call.
>
> Many thanks,
> —
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 10:43:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:27:03 UTC