- From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 16:14:03 +0530
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 10:43:48 UTC
In my opinion, the comparative study should be in the WoT arch doc as a state-of-the-art study. Soumya Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 | https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta On 17-05-2016 16:01, Dave Raggett wrote: > Many IoT organisations have worked on architectures, e.g. Industrial > Internet Consortium, IEEE P2413, ISO/IEC JTC 1/WG 10, AIOTI, and of > course us. Given that we’re positioning the W3C as defining > inter-platform standards, it would make sense for us to try to relate > these different architectures. Where should this work be written up? > For instance, the technology landscape document, the Web of Things > architecture document, or perhaps something new? > > Can we add this as an agenda item for the IG call. > > Many thanks, > — > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 10:43:48 UTC