- From: Soumya Kanti Datta <soumya-kanti.datta@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:38:55 +0200
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- CC: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Don't forget SMEs not having a big team and doing a lot of innovation in IoT and WoT spaces. Soumya Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta On 12/05/2016 15:09, Dave Raggett wrote: > >> On 12 May 2016, at 13:46, Soumya Kanti Datta >> <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr <mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>> >> wrote: >> >> >> Dave, >> >> I agree that we need work items on semantics and security. > > Great - I will put some thoughts together for these to stimulate > discussion, including people at potential member organisations. > >> But from my exp, not a lot of developer can create software modules >> for semantic computing. So, with a colleague of mine, I worked on >> creating a framework trying to hide semantics from developers. It was >> the same I talked about during the last f2f open day. >> >> I feel best practice guidelines are highly necessary to give >> guidelines to developers. > > Most people are specialists in some area or other. This is why teams are > important as a way to bring together people with complementary skills. > Guidelines that can help different kinds of developers would indeed be > useful, but as Alan says, not sufficient to convince people to come and > be part of the Interest Group and help us progress. > >> >> Soumya >> >> Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 | >> https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta >> >> >> Quoting Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>: >> >>> Hi Soumya, >>> >>> Do you think that a ?best practices? document will be sufficient to >>> attract new members? Wouldn?t it be much weaker than having >>> explicit work items on semantics and security? >>> >>>> On 12 May 2016, at 03:20, Soumya Kanti Datta >>>> <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr >>>> <mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Dave, >>>> I agree that semantics and security are really vital for WoT. At >>>> the same time, we must keep in mind that WoT or IoT is highly >>>> interdisciplinary. Therefore, it would be good to create a best >>>> practices deliverable/document (showing guidelines for global >>>> interoperability) to attract the developers. >>>> Soumya >>>> Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 | >>>> https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded >>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded> | Skype id: >>>> soumyakantidatta >>>> On 11-05-2016 19:49, Dave Raggett wrote: >>>>> What do we need to do in the IG charter to make it easier to >>>>> attract new members? Before writing a pull request, it makes >>>>> sense to first discuss this challenge and see what ideas emerge >>>>> and where we have a rough consensus. >>>>> >>>>> When talking with people in IoT alliances and other standards >>>>> development organisations, I have seen that there is general >>>>> agreement on the importance of semantic interoperability and >>>>> security. W3C is respected for its work on standards relating to >>>>> RDF and linked data, and is expected to take the lead on enabling >>>>> declarative domain models and constraints. >>>>> >>>>> For security, so far each organisation has approached this >>>>> independently. This risks problems for end to end security for >>>>> services that span platforms specified by different organisations. >>>>> Without shared trust assumptions, parties will only be able to >>>>> share data that is marked as being publicly accessible. By >>>>> focusing on inter-platform standards for the IoT, W3C has a >>>>> mission to work with the IoT organisations to encourage alignment >>>>> over trust assumptions for security and how to describe this in >>>>> metadata. >>>>> >>>>> We have very few people currently in the IG with the requisite >>>>> experience. What do we need to do in the new IG charter to help >>>>> attract such people? >>>>> >>>>> Do you agree that semantics and security are critical to realising >>>>> the potential for the Web of Things? >>>>> >>>>> One idea would be to add explicit deliverables on semantic >>>>> modelling and end to end security, what do you think? >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org> <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> ? >>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org> <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message was sent using EURECOM Webmail: http://webmail.eurecom.fr >> >> > > — > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> > > >
Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 08:39:24 UTC