- From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 14:42:51 +0200
- To: Frank Reusch <frank.reusch@lemonbeat.com>
- Cc: "public-wot-ig@w3.org" <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Hi Frank, I am on board with your idea and would support you. I am going to start looking into security, privacy and trust in my work preety soon. But I would not be able to travel to next F2F but attend remotely. Regards, Soumya Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 | https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta Quoting Frank Reusch <frank.reusch@lemonbeat.com>: > Soumya, > good idea. In Beijing I want to present some remarks regarding WoT > security. A lot of organizations and experts define scopes for their > outcomes. If you make an overlaying of all this scopes you can find > gaps. I want to develop a holistic view of WoT/IoT security in some > iterations. In front of Beijing I want to discuss this first draft > with Oliver and members of this IG, which are interested in this > theme. Hope you are on board. Meanwhile I make some interviews with > security experts outside W3C. After the final iteration we´ll have a > complete view regarding WoT/IoT security. This complete view is much > bigger than our WoT scope, but we know all interdependencies in this > area. May be other W3C WG can benefit from this. > PS: Continuous improvement / Kaizen is a strong part of this > approach, ´cause the world is evolving dynamically. > > Frank > > Von: Soumya Kanti Datta [mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2016 04:21 > An: public-wot-ig@w3.org > Betreff: Re: How to attract new members to the WoT IG? > > Dave, > I agree that semantics and security are really vital for WoT. At the > same time, we must keep in mind that WoT or IoT is highly > interdisciplinary. Therefore, it would be good to create a best > practices deliverable/document (showing guidelines for global > interoperability) to attract the developers. > Soumya > > > Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 | > > https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta > On 11-05-2016 19:49, Dave Raggett wrote: > What do we need to do in the IG charter to make it easier to attract > new members? Before writing a pull request, it makes sense to > first discuss this challenge and see what ideas emerge and where we > have a rough consensus. > > When talking with people in IoT alliances and other standards > development organisations, I have seen that there is general > agreement on the importance of semantic interoperability and > security. W3C is respected for its work on standards relating to > RDF and linked data, and is expected to take the lead on enabling > declarative domain models and constraints. > > For security, so far each organisation has approached this > independently. This risks problems for end to end security for > services that span platforms specified by different organisations. > Without shared trust assumptions, parties will only be able to share > data that is marked as being publicly accessible. By focusing on > inter-platform standards for the IoT, W3C has a mission to work with > the IoT organisations to encourage alignment over trust assumptions > for security and how to describe this in metadata. > > We have very few people currently in the IG with the requisite > experience. What do we need to do in the new IG charter to help > attract such people? > > Do you agree that semantics and security are critical to realising > the potential for the Web of Things? > > One idea would be to add explicit deliverables on semantic modelling > and end to end security, what do you think? > > ? > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org<mailto:dsr@w3.org>> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using EURECOM Webmail: http://webmail.eurecom.fr
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 12:43:23 UTC