"Lynn, James (Application Defender / Fortify on Demand)" wrote:
> Can you clarify something regarding this example?
> A ‘real’ heater typically has a thermostat which can be set to some
I disagree on your definition of "real" :-)
Baseboard heaters for instance are either on or off.
Water radiators have valves with different settings (other than on/off), but
also are controlled by thermostats, sometimes many of them in the room, and
usually with a safety to turn things off.
The thermostat is in the room (or sometimes just the house!), and we have
reason to believe that in the future we'll want more detailed control over
the heaters...
So my take is that *heaters* do not have a thermostat, but rather a heating
system or Climate Control system would have that.
> computer, etc. does not. So they are different ‘types’ of heaters. One
> proposal seems to be saying it is useful to know that a computer can be used
> as a heater but not necessary. Another is that ‘things do what they say they
> do’. Are we proposing that a computer may declare that it is a heater?
Not that the computer says it is a heater, but rather, the computer says that
it creates heat.
> Or perhaps the view is that it really doesn’t matter, it’s outside the spec?
I think it matters, but I think it's a question of different facets.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-