Re: thing description question

Hi Dave,

The points you have mentioned can be tackled using the mechanisms 
described in IPSO alliance framework and LwM2M TS. But it makes sense to 
investigate them since TD is an enabler of those aspects. To get some 
ideas take a look at -

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7104900

Soumya

Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 |
https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

On 21-04-2016 22:32, Dave Raggett wrote:
>
>> On 21 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Soumya Kanti Datta 
>> <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr 
>> <mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> With the semantic based TD, how can we use it for automatic 
>> management of things? If you see IPSO alliance or OMA LwM2M - they 
>> provide guidelines on how to use CoRE Link Format for TD and utilize 
>> that for management.
>>
>> Did someone from TF-TD alrady investigate into this.
>
> Can you expand on what kind of management capabilities you’re thinking of?
>
> Off the top of my head, some ideas include:  transfer of ownership, 
> transfer of service provider, software/security updates, changes to 
> metadata, e.g. to switch protocols or communication patterns, or for 
> the discovery mechanisms used by devices, for access to logs, and the 
> ability to clear logs.
>
> Do we want to make management capabilities an explicit area of study 
> in the new Interest Group charter?
>
> —
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
>
>
>