W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > April 2016

RE: thing description question

From: Charpenay, Victor <victor.charpenay@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:14:52 +0000
To: "Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr" <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>, "public-wot-ig@w3.org" <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6E3FA85ED8C35E42B0F7DE1E44FD0C9FFAE05E@DENBGAT9EL5MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
Hi Soumya,

could you give us a link to those guidelines? From what I found, they consist in using a CoRE Resource Directory to store objects but it seems rather straightforward since LwM2M and IPSO objects are RESTful by design. Maybe there is more?

Anyway, isn't the Thingweb Repository an implementation of what you are looking for? By the way, the idea of a Thing Repository had been questioned (shortly before Nice), since it seems very similar in spirit to a Resource Directory. Yet, it provides a SPARQL interface, which covers and extends by far the query mechanism of a Resource Directory.


-----Original Message-----
From: Soumya Kanti Datta [mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 21. April 2016 11:42
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Subject: thing description question


With the semantic based TD, how can we use it for automatic management of things? If you see IPSO alliance or OMA LwM2M - they provide guidelines on how to use CoRE Link Format for TD and utilize that for management.

Did someone from TF-TD alrady investigate into this.


Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 | https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta

Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 14:15:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:58 UTC