W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-ig@w3.org > May 2015

RE: [IG-SP] Blog Posting "The IoT Security Broker"

From: Lynn, James (Fortify on Demand Security Services) <james.lynn@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 16:04:25 +0000
To: "Pfaff, Oliver" <oliver.pfaff@siemens.com>, "public-wot-ig@w3.org" <public-wot-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B87EBCE245953F46842BEF54DE7B858E654ACF41@G9W0343.americas.hpqcorp.net>
FYI - I work with Daniel at HP, we are in the same group. He runs our Application Security Research team and is very interested in IoT security issues. If there is any input the group would like from him I'm sure he would be happy to discuss.

Regards,

James Lynn

Director of Emerging Markets
HP Fortify on Demand

Tel : +1.484.239.7535
James.Lynn@hp.com<mailto:James.Lynn@hp.com>





From: Pfaff, Oliver [mailto:oliver.pfaff@siemens.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:50 AM
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org
Subject: [IG-SP] Blog Posting "The IoT Security Broker"

I suggest to use the prefix [IG-SP] to identify mails that consider WoT security and privacy

FYI: there is an interesting blog posting on IoT security that I wanted to share: https://danielmiessler.com/blog/iot-security-broker

In particular I think the diagram is nice (source: https://dmiessler.cachefly.net/images/IoT-Security-Broker1.jpg):

[cid:image001.jpg@01D0872B.A08D9080]

There should not be too many news for those with background in IoT/WoT security. However it appears to provide a level of abstraction that could help when communicating with other stake holders

Regards,
Oliver


image001.jpg
(image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg)

Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2015 16:05:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:33 UTC