- From: Henny Swan <hswan@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:43:25 +0000
- To: lwatson@paciellogroup.com
- Cc: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>, public-wot-ig@w3.org
- Message-Id: <B90A21FD-86F5-4703-9BE7-7B129575ABD0@paciellogroup.com>
+1 for including accessibility into the use case. As some of you will already be aware the WoT’s Workshop in Berlin published a paper on Accessibility and the Web of Things which describes a number of use cases that cover the potential benefits and barriers for people with disabilities [1]. Henny [1] Accessibility and the Web of Things (PDF) http://www.w3.org/2014/02/wot/papers/sajka.pdf > On 24 Mar 2015, at 08:09, Léonie Watson <LWatson@PacielloGroup.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to extend this use case to include accessibility? > Accessibility is an over-arching use case across the WoT, but it has > particular relevance within the area of home automation. > > People with disabilities may find it difficult to interact with existing > home functions - like heating, security etc. People who are blind may > struggle to use hardware controls they cannot see, people with cognitive > difficulties may struggle to understand complex hardware controls, and > people with physical disabilities may not have the motor capability needed > to use hardware controls. > > Through the WoT it will be possible to access these functions through > different means - apps on devices with screen readers, websites where speech > recognition tools can be used, or even for a trusted third party to manage > household functions on behalf of someone else. > > Léonie. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Takuki Kamiya [mailto:tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com] >> Sent: 24 March 2015 05:39 >> To: public-wot-ig@w3.org >> Subject: [use cases] Integrated Home Automation, Demand Response and >> security >> >> Hi, >> >> Below is Fujitsu's WOT use case contribution draft. >> I may need to update the style to fit the latest expected format. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Takuki Kamiya >> Fujitsu Laboratories of America >> >> >> Integrated Home Automation, Demand Response and security >> =============================== >> >> What is the user motivation for the use case >> ------------------------------------------------ >> >> Many households nowadays use one or more of Home Automation service, >> Demand-Response (DR) service or Securities and more. For DR subscription >> and operation, a home gateway device communicates with an aggregator to >> shed energy use on when asked. Home automation, typically also with a >> home gateway, enables cloud-based monitoring and control of home devices >> based-on pre-defined rules that perform actions based on conditions or >> triggers such as weather forecast or push on doorbells. >> Security services also install sensors and provide cloud-based control of >> security features such as arming/disarming and monitoring. >> >> There is an increasing need to integrate those discrete services from >> different vendors harmoniously to increase the total benefit by > orchestrating >> them. >> >> >> How does this translate to a technical Description >> -------------------------------------------------- >> >> Clear separation of roles between home gateway through which to manage >> devices >> and sensors at home, and management platform that enables mashed-up, >> coordinated >> cloud-based services. Each device and sensor connects to home gateway >> through >> various technologies (e.g. Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ZigBee, etc.). >> >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 09:43:55 UTC