- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:46:51 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wiki-dev@w3.org
On 2007-11-27 20:59:34 -0500, Sandro Hawke wrote: > This "policy" will be adopted on a WG by WG basis. I expect > OWL will adopt it, and others are free to follow it or come > up with something different. > Thoughts? Concerns? "Pick a user name and passwod; let your Team Contact know what the user name is, so he can add you to the ACL. Typical Wiki User names have the form FirstnameLastname." seems to have worked pretty well in the groups that I'm dealing with; not sure a policy of any length is called for. I agree that it would be great to be able to get along without maintaining a separate ACL and a separate set of user names and passwords. However, it's not at all clear to me that OpenId is the solution to that problem, in particular since it doesn't solve the "connect a Wiki's write ACL with DBWG" part. I actually suspect that the cost of connecting our wikis to the usual ACL system might be (possibly significantly) lower. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 08:46:58 UTC