Re: editsection ?

+1  (sectionedits are a very useful feature)

On Freitag, 19. Oktober 2007, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> In the w3cmonobook style, which is now the default, I had put the line:
>
>    main.css:
>          .editsection { display: none; }   /* added by sandro as a way
>               to hide [edit] links, which maybe clutter the site too much?
> */
>
> because I didn't know about the wiki flag [1]
>    __NOEDITSECTION__
>
> Now that I know about NOEDITSECTION, I propose to change w3cmonobook
> back.  We might want to make the edit link more subtle [suggestions?],
> but I think it is generally a good idea, especially for longer
> documents.
>
> (Responses on the order of +1, +0, -0, -1, ... are in order, as per
> Apache Voting [1].)
>
>      - Sandro
>
> [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words.
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html



-- 
Markus Krötzsch
Institut AIFB, Universät Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe
phone +49 (0)721 608 7362        fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de        www  http://korrekt.org