- From: Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:48:35 +0800
- To: Mauro Pereira Junior <mauropereirajr@gmail.com>, Natan Sągol <m@merlinnot.com>, Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>, WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, service-worker-discuss@chromium.org
Yeah that's what I thought :-( On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com> wrote: > Regarding the very recent comments following on from: - > https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/745#issuecomment-344128148 > > Can any of you please explain what is wrong with the complete POC solution > here: - > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7Rmd3Rn8_hDNW1zSWRoXzBTclU > > If the proposed solution is somehow deficient or not fit for purpose > please let me know! > > I believe the permissions/user-visibility conundrums to be the only loose > end. > > Please also note the plethora of use cases detailed by numerous people > over the years that can be found here: - > https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/745 > > I do not understand Marcos' claim that there is little browser interest > when Edge and Chrome are waiting on a specification to implement. Firefox > already allows tracking of users in the background today. > > Cheers Richard Maher >
Received on Saturday, 17 February 2018 00:49:12 UTC