- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:44:00 +0200
- To: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@domblogger.net>, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
"Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@domblogger.net> writes: > […] > > The small increase in CSS file size doesn't matter with high bandwidth > clients and is justified for low-bandwidth as it reduces the content > that needs to be fetched. > > It would be up to the client to define the device-bandwidth, web > developers should create the CSS for high bandwidth and only have the > alternate CSS kick in when a media query says it is low. > > Honestly I think low or high are the only definitions needed with low > being the only one that a site should have conditional styles set for. I suspect that developers that cared enough to use such a thing would be able to create CSS that is not bloated enough to need the feature … take advertising for example: Almost all pages become smaller without ads and still there exists no <ad> element; incentives for advertisers to markup advertisments on web pages do not exist. Same for tracking scripts etc.. Note that browsers contain tools to limit loading speed to e.g. UMTS/3G. Greetings, -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Sunday, 25 June 2017 14:41:31 UTC