- From: Roger Hågensen <rh_whatwg@skuldwyrm.no>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:29:22 +0200
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 2017-07-26 16:52, Philipp Serafin wrote: > That sounds like a very expensive solution for a technology that was > supposed to enable bots to consume web pages *without* needing to cut > through all the bloat. Yeah. As far as I know, content is still king at Google. So extra weight will be given to whatever is shown to the visitors (seeing or non-seeing). This article by one of the guys behind JDON-LD is also interesting. http://manu.sporny.org/2014/json-ld-origins-2/ The semantic web was at the bottom of his list when making the specification, so JSON-LD is not really designed for semantics. To me JSON-LD looks like a standardized way to store common data using JSON. Myself in my apps I would not use JSON-LD as my own apps would use a internal API or I'd define a custom API using JSON. JSON-LD would be overkill for the play history for a web player for example, as you'd have to support all of the JSON-LD specs if you want to remain compliant. No browser support JSON-LD, so you'd need a larger library to handle it. I rely on native browser functionality as possible to avoid 3rd party libraries. Something like JSON-LD would make more sense with something like The Internet Archive and so on, as part of a official public API etc. -- Unless specified otherwise, anything I write publicly is considered Public Domain (CC0). My opinions are my own unless specified otherwise. Roger Hågensen, Freelancer, Norway.
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 15:29:48 UTC