- From: MegaZone <megazone@megazone.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:15:49 -0400
- To: Jacob Villarreal <jv1597@yahoo.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, "rh_whatwg@skuldwyrm.no" <rh_whatwg@skuldwyrm.no>, Shane Hudson <successcircuit@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Jacob Villarreal <jv1597@yahoo.com> wrote: > Sorry, correction on the code above: > <source port:[ticker_port]><destination record:path/ticker_data.rec/+1>or,<destination > record:path/ticker_data.rec/29> > Thanks. > How is this any different from PHP, ASP, JSP, .Net, ColdFusion, etc? You could implement your CML on the backend and have it 'output' XML/HTML+JavaScript+CSS for delivery to user agents with compatibility with everything out there today. If you want to try to replace HTML, JavaScript, and CSS so that every user agent needs to understand CML natively - that's just not going to happen. There are many server-side options and it really sounds like that's where CML would fit. Your developers would write in CML, and the 'engine' would render that into the appropriate content for delivery to UAs. Personally I don't see value in this proposal. -- -MegaZone / Geek, Gweep, Technophile, me. / Hail Eris, All Hail Discordia Personal: Google+ <https://plus.google.com/111890035512083705389/posts> / Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/megazone> / Twitter <https://twitter.com/#!/megazone> / LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/megazone> / LiveJournal <http://zonereyrie.livejournal.com/> / Web <http://www.megazone.org/> / Email <megazone@megazone.org> Editor, Gizmo Lovers: Blog <http://www.gizmolovers.com/> / Google+ <https://plus.google.com/b/101158028647216708758/> / Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/GizmoLovers> / Twitter <https://twitter.com/#!/GizmoLovers> / Email <editor@gizmolovers.com> "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 432-363-4296
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 12:16:44 UTC