Re: [whatwg] Reviving ImageBitmap options: Intend to spec and implement

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Justin Novosad <junov@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com> wrote:
>
> > ImageBitmap is not useful for getting the data from: it still requires
> > synchronous use of a canvas to turn in to an ImageData. I would encourage
> > browser vendors to look at my spec proposal to avoid this:
> > http://wicg.github.io/img-conversion/
>
>
> Yes, that is on our radar. We need APIs to move image data without making
> so many intermediate copies in RAM. AFAIK, this appears to be a real
> problem for image manipulation apps, which tend to quickly run out of RAM.
> ImageBitmap partially addresses this, but it does little for apps that need
> to do direct image data manipulation.
>

http://kakukogou.github.io/spec-imagebitmap-extension/

Rob
-- 
lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr  rdn rdsme,anea lurpr  edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf
toD
selthor  stor  edna  siewaoeodm  or v sstvr  esBa  kbvted,t
rdsme,aoreseoouoto
o l euetiuruewFa  kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr  rdm  or rnea
lurpr
.a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t  nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr
esn

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 23:25:17 UTC