- From: Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:57:11 +0800
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Cc: WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote: > > Le 2 déc. 2016 à 08:53, Richard Maher <maherrj@googlemail.com> a écrit : > > The main goal of background geolocation reporting > > Previous related threads: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev. > geolocation/D5UXf-N3JfU Chalk and Chees. But I do want wakelock functionality as well. > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2016Feb/0016.html Since then the Geofencing API has died > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2016Feb/0017.html Well worth reading > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2016Feb/0010.html Yep > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev. > geolocation/UXkd3Tz1GPc Unrelated. I managed to get Chrome's implementation of the GeoFence API canned and a wakeLock is not battery friendly and not secure except for constantly foreground APPs such as navigation.
Received on Friday, 2 December 2016 01:57:44 UTC