Re: [whatwg] W3C Timed Text Working Group proposal for HTMLCue

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Nigel Megitt wrote:
> >On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Nigel Megitt wrote:
> >> 
> >> We think an HTML cue as a variant of the third option is the best 
> >> solution.
> >
> >If you do this please make sure to define in detail how it should all 
> >work.
> 
> Are you commenting that it is not a bad proposal in principle, given 
> extra detail, or that it is not a proposal that can be assessed at all 
> with the current level of detail?

More the latter. I do think the work involved would be quite substantial.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 10 September 2015 22:35:54 UTC