- From: Andrea Rendine <master.skywalker.88@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:09:41 +0100
- To: WHATWG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Someone also said that "once it used to work" or that "it no longer works", even if I don't feel I can trust it. Also consider that <noscript> is somehow blunt as it detects whether JS is disabled, but its content is not parsed if JS is enabled but for any reason it doesn't work. 2015-03-26 20:21 GMT+01:00 Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:10:56 +0100, Andrea Rendine < > master.skywalker.88@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3252743/using- >> javascript-to-override-or-disable-meta-refresh-tag >> This thread is quite full of examples with authors trying to remove <meta> >> after it is loaded or to hide it inside <noscript>, two not viable >> solutions. >> > > It looks like the person who asked the question in that thread would be > happy with <noscript> had it worked in the "cell phone browser" he was > interested in. But it would be better without <noscript>, certainly. Also > several people assumed that it would work to remove the element to stop the > timeout, which is entirely reasonable. > > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 20:10:06 UTC