- From: Martin Janecke <whatwg.org@prlbr.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:53:12 +0100
- To: whatwg@whatwg.org, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>
Am .03.2015, 11:10 Uhr, schrieb Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>: > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 01:47:57 +0100, Martin Janecke > <whatwg.org@prlbr.com> wrote: > >> Am .03.2015, 16:08 Uhr, schrieb Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>: >> >>> […] >>> >>> It seems to me that there are two use cases: >>> >>> 1. variable-size image map >>> 2. art direction image map >>> >>> (1) is more common than (2). >> >> Yes, you're right. >> >> >>> If there is implementor interest, I think it makes sense to make <map> >>> address use case (1) first, and after that maybe also use case (2). Is >>> there? :-) >> >> I'd say there's a good chance that a solution for (1) could also cover >> (2). So it might be helpful to keep (2) in mind while working on (1) in >> order not to miss that chance … If there is implementor interest. > > How? Consider the "AMC Networks" image map in the footer of > http://www.wetv.com/ . Make the window narrower than 600px, the image > map will have a different layout. Ah, I see. I didn't understand correctly what "art direction" meant here. Mea culpa.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:53:40 UTC