- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:41:18 +0100
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > My understanding is that the current consensus proposal for canvas in > Workers is not what's in the spec, but this: > https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/WorkerCanvas > See "Canvas in Workers" threads from October 2013 for the discussion. svn > is failing me but the CanvasProxy proposal in the spec definitely predates > those threads. > > Ian, unless I'm wrong, it would be helpful to remove the CanvasProxy stuff > from the spec to avoid confusion. > > That proposal contains WorkerCanvas.toBlob, which needs to be updated to > use promises. There's also https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/WorkerCanvas2 it seems. It would be interesting to know what the latest on this is. Canvas in workers has been discussed for a long time now and we're still not at the point of implementing. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2015 10:41:46 UTC