W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2015

[whatwg] HTML6 single-page apps without Javascript proposal now on Github

From: Bobby Mozumder <mozumder@futureclaw.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 05:18:53 -0400
Message-Id: <A948BD2C-A27A-4CEF-B56C-6A335F43F413@futureclaw.com>
To: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
https://github.com/mozumder/HTML6

I’ll be updating that Github with more ideas and refinement about the proposal with occasional feedback into this list.  Since this is getting some attention it’s probably better to place the ideas in a setting that can be updated/modified than to discuss it informally via email over here.  This is still at the concept phase and I’ll be looking at feedback from other people as well as other frameworks to see the good they offered as well as what caused them to fail.  

In this version, a key change is that I added an MREF property to <A> elements to separate the canonical URL from an API URL, and a RECEIVER property to specify where the API data loads:

	<A href=“http://www.mywebsite.com/article-2.html" mref=“http://api.mywebsite.com/article-2" receiver="MyArticleData">

The MREF will maintain backwards compatibility.  You can use the same web page in an older browser and it operates fine, it just won’t load API endpoints, but will reload full page from the HREF.  And previously I had a MODEL property in place of RECEIVER, but that's the overall model’s outlet for all elements, not a receiver model, which can be different.  Adding a MODEL property would load the model’s properties into the HREF and/or <A> element.

I also changed the fixtures in the example from XML to JSON.  I always thought XML was more readable when mixed with HTML, but it looks like people prefer reading JSON?

Meanwhile, it looks like the people most into Javascript are against this, and the people that prefer to avoid Javascript like this. 

I get that most people here are in the “Javascript everywhere!” camp but there definitely is a large class of people out there that prefer to minimize their use of Javascript whenever possible and just want to deal with the declarative HTML system.  These are content managers, and Javascript components are largely in the UI design domain, not the content domain that many web developers are coming from. How many UI design experts are out there?  And how many of them like working with Javascript, instead of Swift or something else?  You’re competing against that.

Also I feel you shouldn’t have to prototype new HTML elements as Javascript components to advance HTML.  That’s a huge barrier to its development, as now you need to do that first.  Very few people will do so for a standards body.  The components they make are going to be very specific to their needs.  Plus, browser makers aren’t going to write them, so you just forced them to wait for someone else to design these components first, when they already know the problems their users are experiencing and can fix them already.  And if your site can do it with a custom component then why bother putting it into the standard?

Finally, aren’t people already doing this sort of prototyping anyways with the Javascript frameworks?  At a high-level, they’re all basically prototyping an entire MVC use model, with just implementation differences between them.  Isn’t that enough to cause HTML to be updated to fit this MVC design pattern?  It’s a basic issue in the design of the web.

-bobby
---
Bobby Mozumder
Editor-in-Chief
FutureClaw Magazine
mozumder@futureclaw.com <mailto:mozumder@futureclaw.com>
+1-240-745-5287
www.futureclaw.com <http://www.futureclaw.com/>
twitter.com/futureclaw <https://www.twitter.com/futureclaw>
www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder <http://www.linkedin.com/in/mozumder>
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 09:39:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:29 UTC