- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:05:49 +0100
- To: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Can someone explain why the postMessage() design exposes transfered ports both in .data and .ports? If that's a legacy artifact, can we call that out somewhere? (Asking around on IRC suggests it's an artifact that needs to be preserved by new variations of the postMessage() design, as e.g. seen in service workers. So the API remains somewhat consistent across variations. We might want to stipulate that too somehow.) -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 13:06:16 UTC