- From: Kevin Marks <kevinmarks@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:33:14 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: WHAT working group <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Benjamin Francis <bfrancis@mozilla.com>
Does this mean we can now have rel=icon with SVG instead of providing a bitmap for every iOS device specifically (when we add to homepage)? Do chrome and Firefox support SVG icon images? On 24 Jun 2015 2:40 pm, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > To close the loop on this, we will change to <link rel="mask-icon" > href="whatever.svg" color="#aabbcc">. We like the idea of determining the > color from the SVG, but we won't be able to implement in time for this > cycle, and having an explicit color override seems useful. So for now we'll > implement explicit color and we'll consider automatic color picking based > on the SVG as a fallback when the color is missing as a future extension. > > > > Please let me know if anyone disagrees with this approach. > > Sounds acceptable to me. What's the grammar of color=''? Just hex, > or full CSS <color>? (Either is fine with me.) > > ~TJ >
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 03:33:41 UTC