W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2015

Re: [whatwg] Relative URL plan

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:23:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78ieYvVpiJK_YteVUkqKa50Cswn1reo+CcCgDYZQjn344A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> Why can't you?  If it's something you want to reason about as a separate
> entity, why doesn't it make sense to set it as a separate entity?

Actually, it seems like you can, though that would equally affect data
URLs, but maybe that's not too bad. I guess for the API we could
special case a couple of schemes to not support reading/writing as
desired for optimizations.

Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 18:23:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:33 UTC