- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:07:17 +0100
- To: Glen Huang <curvedmark@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Glen Huang <curvedmark@gmail.com> wrote: > Or, the current algorithm of replace could be reversed, which should eliminate such confusion. I think as James said that would leave the confusion. And given the precedent in libraries, replaceWith() seems good. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 12:38:22 UTC