- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:41:53 +0100
- To: "James M. Greene" <james.m.greene@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Glen Huang <curvedmark@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:14 PM, James M. Greene <james.m.greene@gmail.com> wrote: > jQuery is famous (and sometimes infamous, depending on who you talk to) for > its API brevity and yet we still chose longer names for these scenarios: > `replaceWith` and `replaceAll` (even including "All" in the latter to > clarify that it operates on the entire context set, not just the first > element). > > Dojo uses the same method names as well for their NodeList > implementation: `replaceWith` and `replaceAll`. Thanks, that's compelling. Is it a problem for anyone if we rename replace to replaceWith? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 10:43:38 UTC