W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2014

Re: [whatwg] Canvas and Paths

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:30:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDC0H+kx35ymroJbRU=sw5vT1nxdhbxtc6_aXNCr3HeDWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
>> I don't think the arguments for removing these are compelling. The
>> problems with the APIs have been addressed (e.g. there's no ambiguity in
>> the case of overlapping text), the use cases are clear (e.g. drawing text
>> around an arc or drawing a label along a line graph's line), and the API
>> now supports the constructs to do unions of fill regions.
> Where is the union of fill regions specified? All I see is segments
> aggregation.

I found this in the spec:
Unfortunately, it is not enough because it doesn't let you aggregate paths
with different winding rules.

It also can't be implemented efficiently (or at all) since it relies on a
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2014 04:31:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:17 UTC