- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 18:39:23 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "whatwg@whatwg.org" <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > > Ok. It seems odd that the events are following the dom of the fallback > > elements and not of the hit regions. > > It's what events normally do. I guess we could make this more elaborate, > but it's not clear what the use case is. Can you elaborate? The weirdness is that the pseudo hit region DOM can be different from the fallback dom. So, if b is a child of a, but the fallback element for b is not a child of the fallback element for a, you won't get the event on a if you hit b. > > > It states "When a MouseEvent is to be fired at a canvas element", > > > which seems pretty unambiguous. > > > > That's not all that clear :-) > > Maybe it's better to state explicitly which events are routed. > > I don't understand. How is the current text not explicit? Are you > concerned about interfaces that inherit from MouseEvent? > > > > > > Probably only mouse and touch events should be intercepted and > > > > forwarded. > > > > > > Currently touch events are not routed. Should those be added? > > > > Yes. > > I couldn't really see a sane way to do it (e.g. consider if two touches > change at the same time, but they started on different regions on the same > canvas). Do you have a proposal for how to make touch event rerouting work > for canvas regions? The touch class [1] could be updated with a region string. As you move your fingers, the id would reflect what regions your fingers are on. > > > > For instance, if the fallback is an edit control and the user > > > > drag-selects some text on the canvas, is it expected that this text > > > > is also selected in the edit control? > > > > > > You can't validly include a text field in canvas fallback precisely > > > because of this kind of thing. See: > > > > > > http://whatwg.org/html#best-practices > > > > I saw you extended the list of fallback elements to include: > > > > an element that would not be interactive content > > except for having the tabindex attribute specified > > > > Would that not include text fields? > > How would it include text fields? Can you elaborate on what you mean? I > don't really follow. Never mind. I reread the spec and this is covered. 1: http://www.w3.org/TR/touch-events/#touch-interface
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2014 02:39:50 UTC