- From: Arpita Bahuguna <a.bah@samsung.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:31:28 +0530
- To: 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, 'Arpita Bahuguna' <arpitabahuguna@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org
Hi Julian, Please find my comments inline: -----Original Message----- From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 3:10 PM To: Arpita Bahuguna Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org; Arpita Bahuguna Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposal to add website-* meta extensions On 2014-07-16 11:31, Arpita Bahuguna wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Thank-you for your views. > > Are you suggesting that we instead introduce a new link relation > (perhaps "contact") with tel:/mailto: types for specifying these parameters? > > This would involve spec modification. Not sure how developers or > browser vendors take to it. Why would it involve a spec modification? Currently the link types defined by the specification are: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#linkTypes Please correct me if I am wrong but I suspect introducing a new rel type would involve modifying the spec as well. Adding new meta extensions however would not have any such overhead as far as I know. > Was looking for a simpler solution that's quickly implementable. Why is <meta> any simpler than <link>???
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 10:01:11 UTC