W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2014

Re: [whatwg] Simplified <picture> element draft

From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 09:14:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CACj=BEi326wwR3N8JrWXxrPLUj-+f45dm5FtqpwYL0zV1GJr7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com>
Cc: whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>, Timothy Hatcher <timothy@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>>
>> >  Is there an editor's draft or some other relatively self-contained
>> > write-up that I could review?
>> >
>> >
>> Tab has rewritten the picture spec to match the latest proposal. You could
>> review it at http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
>
>
> Kicking off 2014 on the right foot... awesome. :-)
>
> A couple of quick questions:
> a) Example 4 srcset uses "w" units, whereas Example 5 omits the "w".
> Guessing, typos.. but want to be sure.
>

Typos indeed. Good catch.


> b) What happens when <source sizes=> and <img width= height=> are both
> specified? Are the width/height on img ignored?
>

AFAICT this is not currently specified, but it should be. I've opened an
issue [1] regarding it.


[1] https://github.com/ResponsiveImagesCG/picture-element/issues/82
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2014 08:14:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 17:00:15 UTC